krishjaanis ([info]krishjaanis) rakstīja,
The Jeffersonians also had a distinct foreign policy:

- Americans had a duty to spread what Jefferson called the "Empire of Liberty" to the world, but should avoid "entangling alliances."

- A standing army and navy are dangerous to liberty and should be avoided; much better was to use economic coercion such as the embargo.

- The militia was adequate to defend the nation. During the Revolutionary War previously, a national conflict, in this case the War of 1812 required the creation of a national army for the duration of international hostilities.
-------------
Jefferson said that one of the "essential principles of our government" is that of "peace, commerce, and honest friendship with all nations, entangling alliances with none."

+ https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Washington_Doctrine_of_Unstable_Alliances

"According to the policy, the United States should consider external alliances as temporary measures of convenience and freely abandon them when national interest dictates. It has been cited as a rare example of an explicit policy endorsement of what, in international relations, is known as renversement des alliances ("reversal of alliances"): a state abandoning an ally for an alliance with a recent enemy, sometimes against the former ally."


(Lasīt komentārus)

Nopūsties:

No:
( )Anonīms- ehh.. šitajam cibiņam netīk anonīmie, nesanāks.
(komentārs tiks paslēpts, ja vien neesi šitā cibiņa draudziņš)
Lietotājvārds:
Parole:
Temats:
Tematā HTML ir aizliegts
  
Ziņa:

Gandrīz jau aizmirsu pateikt – šis lietotājs ir ieslēdzis IP adrešu noglabāšanu. Operatore Nr. 65.
Neesi iežurnalējies. Iežurnalēties?