The calculations are correct, but I don't think the explanation is the right one. Were you to be correct, this would amount to complete fraud of such caliber that nobody would be able to keep it under the lid: it halves the actual death rate and completely reverses the correlation. Especially given that all the numbers are publicly published this is completeley unbelieveable.

There is another clue as to what could be happening, if we look at the previous report, though:

	18-39 unv. deaths	18-39 unv. count	18-39 3x vacc.+boost deaths	18-39 3x vacc.+boost count
Latest report	90	192'631	177	477'976
Previous report	34	167'248	108	388'262

So what this looks to me is that they are just continually adding some data sets. That would mean that the statistics ar based on partial data - but it also seems that deaths from excluded regions (perhaps because there is no good population estimate) are also not counted.

Wich would mean that we're basically back to square one regarding those strange effects.