Personigi jutos laimiigs. As for future developments, I suppose it depends on why they were revoked. If it was because it was untenable as it became too clear the vaccines didn't prevent transmission (and caused too many adverse reactions), then fine. I suppose that would show that the sceptical part of the public had at least some influence. Not sure if that's true, of course.

I don't think whoeever-the-powers-might-be were too happy with it (the revocation). I say that as we had several influential guys like Blair saying "it would be hard for us (unvaxed) to do a normal life" and so on. This kind politicisation of the vaccine issue could be seen here in Latvia with the SPKC removing information on transmission rates of the various cohorts from their web page when the data become unfavourable - hardly scientific, though quite darkly amusing. The ONS in the UK appears to be having similar issues with publishing updated age-adjusted all-cause mortality per 100,000 people years for 2022 according to Cvd vax status (the higher rates in 4 of the 5 vaxed cohorts is disturbing at thew very least). This kind of behaviour means I remain a sceptic of any mainstream narrative. It doesn't seem honest.

What is around the corner, though, I doubt any of us can say for sure.