Vēl pēdējais spēriens pa ribām beigtajam zirgam (pirms nokāpju no tēmas)
Ok, so mums te bāž degunā "former XR spokeswoman", kas pārmetusies par AES lobijistu.
Tad, lūk, mums arī ir savi pārbēdzeji:
The former heads of nuclear power regulation in the U.S., Germany, and France, along with the former secretary to the UK’s government radiation protection committee, have issued a joint statement that in part says, “Nuclear is just not part of any feasible strategy that could counter climate change."Starp iemesliem:
- More expensive than renewable energy in terms of energy production and CO2 mitigation, even taking into account costs of grid management tools like energy storage associated with renewables rollout.
- Too costly and risky for financial market investment, and therefore dependent on very large public subsidies and loan guarantees.
- Unsustainable due to the unresolved problem of very long-lived radioactive waste.
- Financially unsustainable as no economic institution is prepared to insure against the full potential cost, environmental and human impacts of accidental radiation release – with the majority of those very significant costs being borne by the public
- Subject to too many unresolved technical and safety problems associated with newer unproven concepts, including ‘Advanced’ and Small Modular Reactors (SMRs).
Bonus:
Five former Japanese prime ministers issued declarations that Japan should break with nuclear power generation
(Lasīt komentārus)
Nopūsties: