anarhomo ([info]anarhomo) rakstīja,
@ 2004-09-22 00:23:00

Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
art, considered in its highest vocation, is and remains for us a thing of the past. thereby it has lost for us genuine truth and life, and has rather been transferred into our ideas instead of maintaining its earlier necessity in reality and occupying its higher place. what is now aroused in us by works of art is not just immediate enjoyment, but our judgement also, since we subject to our intellectual consideration (i) the content of art and (ii) the work of art's means of presentation, and the appropriateness or inappropriateness of both to one another. the philosophy of art is therefore a greater need in our days than it was in days when art by itself yielded full satisfaction. art invites us to intelectual considerationm and that not for the purpose of creating art again, but for knowing philosophically what art is. hegel, aesthetics (1828)


(Ierakstīt jaunu komentāru)

art
[info]gedimmteversion
2005-09-19 23:45 (saite)
art, construed broadly, can and does cover both the present, past and future, i deem. it is always productive, fruitful and alive, as long as we keep it in us. it has to be noted that we perceive it by direct and immediate means; a rational judgment can solely take place subsequently but it does not necessarily do and can mostly be dispensed with.

i believe that art and philosophy pertain to various realms of human experience; while the former is spontaneous and predominantly intuitive, the latter is a product of a cognitive effort.

i therefore dismiss the narrow and categorical explanation offered by hegel.

shodien jaaiedzer. nekad muuzhaa veel nebiju striideejies ar heegeli!

(Atbildēt uz šo)


Neesi iežurnalējies. Iežurnalēties?