gnidrologs ([info]gnidrologs) rakstīja,
@ 2018-08-07 16:12:00

Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
Now with Alex Jones, it is clear he was "controlled" opposition (maybe we should call it allowed opposition?) in the sense his existence made their life easier. It was easier to discredit attacks on the establishment by associating them with the Alex Jones brand of low brow and unhinged conspiracy mongering. What they didn't count on is that the conspiracy is now become more and more apparent, to the point you cannot even dismiss someone like Alex Jones as crazy, and also the fact Alex Jones, for all his faults, has actual integrity. Them being so open about their plans and methods has also rendered Alex Jones less unhinged.

Indeed, the irony here is that the problem with him was always that he didn't posses the intellectual sophistication necessary to firmly pinpoint what the issue was. He had good instincts and the passion, energy and tenacity to pursue this campaign against what he knew was there but barely understood it. But by becoming so open and transparent, the establishment has made Alex Jones credible and also useful. When Alex Jones screams that "it is the frikking globalists", you can't just laugh at him and wave him away... because it is the motherfucking frikking globalists and everybody can see it. It was they that kept validating Alex Jones and now they have essentially vindicated his entire brand.


(Ierakstīt jaunu komentāru)

Neesi iežurnalējies. Iežurnalēties?