laacz

(no subject)

Sep. 29th, 2017 | 10:23 am
From:: laacz

Bļins. Pārāk ātri tabenters nospiedās. Citējot pašu adamsu:

"The answer to this is very simple," Adams said. "It was a joke. It had to be a number, an ordinary, smallish number, and I chose that one. Binary representations, base 13, Tibetan monks are all complete nonsense. I sat on my desk, stared in to the garden and thought 42 will do. I typed it out. End of story."

Link | view all comments


Reply

From:
( )Anonymous- this user has disabled anonymous posting.
Username:
Password:
Subject:
No HTML allowed in subject
  
Message:

Notice! This user has turned on the option that logs your IP address when posting.