Kāds rakstīja,
sapratu antiprojekcijas otro rindiņu un piekrītu, bet nevaru to teikt par tālāko viņa tekstu un arī tavējo.
man šķiet, ka resort (un avots, kas varētu būt https://eugyppius.substack.com/p/mass-vaccination-may-permanently vai cita vieta ar to pašu copypastu) runā par kko nedaudz citu:

"This is evidence that our vaccines may permanently compromise immunity to SARS-2, via Original Antigenic Sin — the phenomenon, long observed in the antibody response to influenza infections, that initial exposure to a pathogen (or a spike protein) shapes all subsequent immune responses to mutated, recombined or reassorted instances of that pathogen. Our Corona vaccines elicit antibodies against the spike protein alone, while natural infection provokes antibodies against other virus proteins as well, including the nucleocapsid or N protein. The broad spectrum of natural immune response is why recovered individuals enjoy much greater and longer-lasting protection, than people who have been merely vaccinated."

kas no šī ir meli?


(Lasīt komentārus)

Nopūsties:

No:
Lietotājvārds:
Parole:
Ievadi te 'qws' (liidzeklis pret spambotiem):
Temats:
Tematā HTML ir aizliegts
  
Ziņa:
Neesi iežurnalējies. Iežurnalēties?