"The government could, for example, provide incentives to companies that resist automation, thereby preserving jobs for the less brainy. It could also discourage hiring practices that arbitrarily and counterproductively weed out the less-well-IQ’ed. This might even redound to employers’ benefit: Whatever advantages high intelligence confers on employees, it doesn’t necessarily make for more effective, better employees. Among other things, the less brainy are, according to studies and some business experts, less likely to be oblivious of their own biases and flaws, to mistakenly assume that recent trends will continue into the future, to be anxiety-ridden, and to be arrogant."

WTF?!

(Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread)

Daļēji tur ir nedaudz taisnības. Auksts IQ ne tikai nav vajadzīgs jebkurā profesijā, bet dažās pat būtu traucēklis. Īpaši vairumam ''kšatriju'', kam jādīlo ar high stress/high risk darbiem un domāšanas operativitāte>domāšanas sofisticētība.
Pieņēmums, ka automatizācija pieprasa no cilvēka ''more brains'' gan ir pilnīgs sviests.

(Reply to this) (Parent)