Pilnmēness nogurdinātie - Jānusiņu bandas

From: begemots Date: 20. Septembris 2011 - 16:28 (Link)

piedod, nesapratu pirmā teikuma jēgu.

(Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread)

From: brookings Date: 20. Septembris 2011 - 17:35 (Link)

Piedod. Gribeeju teikt, ka shiis partijas iisti nezog, bet kaarto situaaciiju valstii, lai tie, kas vinjaam (partijaam) maksaa, vareetu dabuut savus labumus. Un ja likumus arii var mainiit/groziit, tad vareetu radiit situaaciju taa, ka tie (kas maksaa) neparkaapj likumus.

Tadeejaadi, var izskaatiities ka ... likumus ieveerojoshas partijaas, kas parstaav likumus ieveerojoshas intereses (law-abiding parties that represent law abiding interests).

So, the moral is if you want it to appear that what you are doing is not, let's say, theft, then change the law (and/or possibly the perception of the morality of the law).

(Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread)

From: begemots Date: 20. Septembris 2011 - 21:27 (Link)

I see, however, I would like to point out that as long as such things are tried by lawful methods, there is usually plenty of professional competition, which might help keep things somewhat in balance.

(Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread)

From: brookings Date: 20. Septembris 2011 - 21:40 (Link)

A fairish point, but I would stress the 'might' and the 'somewhat':)

(Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread)

From: begemots Date: 20. Septembris 2011 - 22:32 (Link)

Well, tas atkarīgs droši vien no tā, vai attiecīgajā nozarē ir arī privātuzņēmumi. Ja ir, tad šāda tipa likumus izbīdīt vairs nav ļoti viegli.

(Reply to this) (Parent)