12 September 2016 @ 03:54 pm
 
vieniigaa teema visu laiku - buut vai nebuut. un tad seko taada groteska saknju sisteema katram variantam. jaa, bet ko tas noziimee, vai nebuut iisteniibaa ir buut kameer buut iisteniibaa ir nebuut.

vispretiigaakaa dziives atzinja: lai ko tu izveeleetos, tas bija lemts.

un tad, ja tu pret sho nolemtiibu sadumpojies, tad taa ir vienkaarshi cita nolemtiibas versija. viss ir visu laiku lemts un paarlemts un izlemts

es skatos vienaa virzienaa, kameer mans virziens skataas citaa virzienaa

varbuut es skatos pati sev pakausii. bet es to nezinu, taapeec es izveelos nebuut, un taa es kljuustu, un esmu. tas kas es negribu buut, taada kaada es negribu kljuut.

visu dziivi nebuut tam, kas tu esi, un shis sveshinieks, kas tu visu dziivi esi bijis, tev ir tuvaaks un paziistamaaks, par jebkuru versiju un virzienu. ar sho sveshinieku tu vari iet liidz pasaules malai un iztureet jebkaadaadas pljaukas, spljaavienus un cirtienus, juus pat varat buut pilniibaa pazudushi nekurienee, bet juus veelaizvien esat aci pret aci atstatus bet sinhroni. parcik, juus esat beedubraalji, juus arii varat zviegt dievam sejaa un sprauslaat un gvelzt un zirgoties un baurot kopaa roku rokaa pilniigi vienalga
 
 
simfonija: christine and the queens - tilted
 
 
( Post a new comment )
[info]krishjaanis on September 12th, 2016 - 11:23 pm
"bija lemts" ir tāda paša līmeņa supposedly mierinoša dzīves gudrība kā "one does what one can"
(Reply) (Thread) (Link)
[info]methodrone on September 12th, 2016 - 11:32 pm
bet leemeejs jau ir pats cilveeks ar visu savu buutni, tur nav nekaa mierinosha
(Reply) (Parent) (Thread) (Link)
[info]krishjaanis on September 12th, 2016 - 11:55 pm
tieši to jau arī gribēju teikt, tās nav nekādas gudrības, tur nav nekā mierinoša.

"Was it such an easy matter for you, my listener, to determine how much that is: what one can? Were you never in such danger that you almost desperately exerted yourself and yet so infinitely wished to be able to do more, and perhaps someone else looked at you with a skeptical and imploring look, whether it was not possible that you could do more? (..)
Was not the real reason for your unrest that you did not know for sure how much one can do, that it seems to you to be so infinitely much at one moment, and at the next moment so very little? Was not your anxiety so painful because you could not penetrate your consciousness, because the more earnestly, the more fervently you wished to act, the more dreadful became the duplexity in which you found yourself: that you might not have done what you could, or that you might actually have done what you could but no one came to your assistance?

So every more earnest doubt, every deeper care is not calmed by the words: One does what one can. If a person is sometimes in the right, sometimes in the wrong, to some degree in the right, to some degree in the wrong, who, then, is the one who makes that decision except the person himself, but in the decision may he not again be to some degree in the right and to some degree in the wrong? Or is he a different person when he judges his act than when he acts? Is doubt to rule, then, continually to discover new difficulties, and is care to accompany the anguished soul and drum past experiences into it? Or would we prefer continually to be in the right in the way irrational creatures are?"


(Reply) (Parent) (Thread) (Link)
[info]methodrone on September 13th, 2016 - 06:49 pm
vieniigais mierinoshais ir situaaciju aprakstiit ar vaardiem (tavs citaats). bet arii tad, apraksts pieprasa taalaaku darbiibu un lemshanu, taadeelj pat shaads mierinaajums ir ljoti iislaiciigs
(Reply) (Parent) (Link)