Tu tač atceries kā filma beidzās :).

(Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread)

Aragorns nebija gluži parasts vīrietis.

(Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread)

Baltais hetero vīrietis, kurš kļuva par galveno un personīgi noslaktēja daudz orku. Viņam kalpoja daudz sieviešu un vīriešu.

(Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread)

Viņš kalpoja saviem pavalstniekiem, tur ir atšķirība starp Aragornu un tipisku balto hetero vīrieti, kas lielākoties māk tikai lekties.

(Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread)

Mūsu valdība arī kalpo tautai. Pilns ar bobām un pediņiem. Laikam vajag kārtīgu hetero veci, lai sakārto sistēmu.

(Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread)

Krievijā un Baltkrievijā pie varas ir baltie heteroveči, Hitlers un Musolīni arī bija baltie heteroveči. Savukārt Vācijā, Dānijā, Norvēģijā un Somijā, piemēram, pie valdības stūres ir sievietes. Manuprāt, tas drīzāk ir saistīts ar to, cik attīstīta ir nācija un cik daudz tajā ir saprātīgu un drosmīgu cilvēku.

(Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread)

Tas ir pēc formulas. Labi laiki, rada vājus vīriešus. Vāji vīrieši rada, sliktus laikus. Slikti laiki rada, stiprus vīriešus. Stipri vīrieši rada, labus laikus.

Pēc manām domām šobrīd esam labo laiku beigu posmā.

(Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread)

tava formula ir pilnīgi nepareiza; īstenībā ir tā:

labi laiki rada labus vīriešus, labi vīrieši rada vājus laikus, vāji laiki rada stiprus vīriešus, stipri vīrieši rada vājus vīriešus, vāji vīrieši rada labus laikus, labi laiki rada labus vīriešus, labi vīrieši rada vājus laikus, vāji laiki rada stiprus vīriešus, stipri vīrieši rada vājus vīriešus, vāji vīrieši rada labus laikus, labi laiki rada labus vīriešus, labi vīrieši rada vājus laikus, vāji laiki rada stiprus vīriešus, stipri vīrieši rada vājus vīriešus, vāji vīrieši rada labus laikus, labi laiki rada labus vīriešus, labi vīrieši rada vājus laikus, vāji laiki rada stiprus vīriešus, stipri vīrieši rada vājus vīriešus, vāji vīrieši rada labus laikus, labi laiki rada labus vīriešus, labi vīrieši rada vājus laikus, vāji laiki rada stiprus vīriešus, stipri vīrieši rada vājus vīriešus, vāji vīrieši rada labus laikus

(Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread)

Nepamatots pieņēmums.

(Reply to this) (Parent)

“Hard times create strong men, strong men create good times, good times create weak men, and weak men create hard times.” The quote, from a postapocalyptic novel by the author G. Michael Hopf, sums up a stunningly pervasive cyclical vision of history. The idea, which I have termed elsewhere “the Fremen Mirage” after the science fiction novel Dune’s desert-dwellers, posits that harsh conditions make for morally pure and militarily strong people, while wealth and sophistication make for decadent societies and poor fighters. Dune is just one example of the numerous speculative fiction novels that use the idea, from the Conan stories to dreadful Star Trek episodes. It is so common as a popular theory of history and military power that it has spawned (like most bad ideas) its own genre of internet memes.

It also infects modern strategic thinking, especially about non-Western foes. Perhaps most famously, after the attack on Pearl Harbor collapsed complacent notions of American superiority, the Allied intelligence community swung wildly from the belief in the Japanese as weak and unmanly to notions of how the harsh conditions of training and life in Japan had churned out apparently unstoppable supersoldiers. More recently, the same trope has reemerged in the invincible insurgent, whose upbringing supposedly renders him immune to the deprivations of combat and campaigning. As the University of Birmingham researcher Patrick Porter notes, “commentators have claimed that Iraqis, Afghans, Yugoslavs, Amerindians, Somalis, Turks or Japanese are particularly predisposed to war,” either to justify or caution against military action or diplomatic engagement. Because it contains within it an assessment of the military strength and combative stubbornness of foreign cultures, the mirage naturally brings strategic implications with it.

And, after all, it makes a degree of intuitive sense. Westerners subject their soldiers to harsh conditions to prepare them for the rigors of combat, so why wouldn’t whole societies work the same? Shouldn’t people (although the trope often specifies men) who’ve dealt with hard conditions all their lives make the best fighters, in contrast to the flabby, decadent inhabitants of the glitzy cities?

This doesn’t change in the shift from prehistory to history. Occasionally the frontiers of the zones of urbanized, stratified state-societies broke. Given enough attempts, nonstate people might eventually win. But most of the time, it was the urban armies that were doing the pillaging. Take Rome’s frontiers, the limes, as an example. Rome is, after all, the byword for decadence and decline in Western discourse. Western cultural memory fixes on the Goths, Vandals, and Huns who broke the Roman frontier, but it is quick to forget the rather longer list of nonstate peoples broken by the Romans. The Samnites, Cimbri, Teutons, Ambrones, Helvetians, Eburones, Arverni, Celtiberians, Lusitanians, Pannones, Dalmatae, Catuvellauni, Iceni, Marcomanni, Quadi, Iazyges, and all of the other “hard” peoples crushed under the Romans do not become household names. Most successful large states in history can boast similar butcher’s bills.

Of course, there are exceptions, like the early Muslim conquests, the Seljuk Empire, and of course the Mongols, which overthrew long-established and long-successful empires. The horse nomad was a powerful force for a time—but one often incorporated into the armies of conventional states. But the victims of empire, out there on the fringes, left no memoirs of the disasters inflicted upon them; when the so-called barbarians won, however, it produced entire literary genres lamenting the fall of the great cities.

(Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread)

Garš blablabla svešvalodā. Uzraksti konspektu latviski.

(Reply to this) (Parent)

kas konkrēti liek tev domāt, ka mēs esam beigu posmā? ES DOMĀJU, KA TU KĻŪDIES

(Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread)

tev ir problēma ar manis doto algoritmu. Pērnā sniega vērtībā man ir tavi uztraukumi un izkliegtā iedoma, jo es domāju, ka man ir taisnība un lielākoties tā arī ir. Beigu posma pagriezienpunkts uz neatgriezenisku iegāšanos haosā bija tavs komentārs, tagad jāgaida kamēr sliktie laiki radīs stipros vīrus.

(Reply to this) (Parent)