20 February 2009 @ 03:05 pm
 
Viens taads subjektiivs noveerojums par, ho ho ho, vechu draudziibu. Neviens tev neko nepaarmetiis, nejauksies un neteiks, ja tu riebiigi izturies pret sievieti. Neko sliktu tas par tevi neliecina un nav nevienam daljas. Pret sievieti driikst. Pasmejas barinjaa par baabaam vai niciigi novelk 'hah, sievietes..' un iemalko alinju. Neko tu vinju aciis nezaudee, ja esi cuucisks pret sievieti. Tas vienkaarshi neskaitaas un punkts.
 
 
( Post a new comment )
shrdlu[info]shrdlu on February 20th, 2009 - 04:09 pm
a sievietēm savā barā nav tāpat? vai arī viņas pēc definīcijas neizturas cūciski? ;)
(Reply) (Thread) (Link)
De contemptu omnium vanitatum mundi[info]hurt on February 20th, 2009 - 04:15 pm
Vechi par attieciibaam verkshkj mazaak nekaa vecenes tas pirmkaart. Vecenes savaa starpaa par to vien un apmainaas ar viedokjiem nonstop as long as I know. Un, ja mana drushka izturas dumji, es vinjai to noteikti ari pasaku.
(Reply) (Parent) (Thread) (Link)
shrdlu[info]shrdlu on February 20th, 2009 - 04:26 pm
dumji un cūcīgi/riebīgi jau nav viens un tas pats..
(Reply) (Parent) (Thread) (Link)
De contemptu omnium vanitatum mundi[info]hurt on February 20th, 2009 - 04:34 pm
patiesiibaa ir. cuuciski iztureeties pret otru ir dumji.
(Reply) (Parent) (Thread) (Link)
murks[info]murks on February 20th, 2009 - 05:00 pm
nu nu nu. tad kas ir dumji?
(Reply) (Parent) (Thread) (Link)
De contemptu omnium vanitatum mundi[info]hurt on February 20th, 2009 - 05:04 pm
viskautkascits protams arii.
(Reply) (Parent) (Thread) (Link)
murks[info]murks on February 20th, 2009 - 05:19 pm
dumji ir viss?

definē "dumji"!
(Reply) (Parent) (Thread) (Link)
De contemptu omnium vanitatum mundi[info]hurt on February 20th, 2009 - 05:21 pm
nu beidz, Tu zini, ko es ar to domaaju.
(Reply) (Parent) (Thread) (Link)
shrdlu[info]shrdlu on February 20th, 2009 - 05:41 pm
es nezinu
(Reply) (Parent) (Thread) (Link)
De contemptu omnium vanitatum mundi[info]hurt on February 20th, 2009 - 05:50 pm
Riikoties dumji - traumeet sevi vai apkaarteejos moraali vai fiziski nezinaashanas, pieredzes truukuma vai audzinaashanas deelj.
(Reply) (Parent) (Thread) (Link)
shrdlu[info]shrdlu on February 20th, 2009 - 06:00 pm
pag, tad jau iemīlēšanās arī zem šīs definīcijas palien :D
(Reply) (Parent) (Thread) (Link)
De contemptu omnium vanitatum mundi[info]hurt on February 20th, 2009 - 06:06 pm
neticeesi, bet miileet var ari bez traumeeshanas. un pamest ari var bez traumeeshanas.
(Reply) (Parent) (Link)