Think about it. When you bite a banana you obtain a banana bite. When you lick a banana you get a banana lick. When you think about a banana you get a banana thought. When you draw the banana you get a banana drawing. When the banana becomes sentient and goes on Oprah and starts to talk—“I found myself in a paragraph about bananas by the authors of Hyposubjects...it was a traumatic self-awakening…”—all you have is banana interview. Even the banana themselves can’t fully access the banana banana. And since licking is just as good or just as bad as thinking at accessing the banana banana, snails and hurricanes are just as good or as bad as humans and there’s nothing special about humans at all.

(Reply to this) (Thread)

"Autoriem vairs nelejiet" :D

(Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread)

Weirdly enough, es tiešām ticu, ka viņi varētu būt bijuši quite skaidrā visu laiku

Nu vai arī kaut kas tur nav ar tiem salātiem

It’s the salad in your mind. And so you are thinking in salad mode, or you’re thinking in salad color—you’re thinking saladly. Of course you can hope saladly, you can promise saladly and hate saladly.

(Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread)

(Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread)

es gan balsotu par sēnēm, ja vispār

(Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread)

TBH jā, tur ir paliels WTF psihodēlijas moments, vismaz man, ē, neiniciētajam

(Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread)

Nu vot, un inicietajam tas nevis vnk meiko sensu, bet liekas "bāc, tas banāna piemērs reāli labi izskaidro, kā darbojas estētiskā sfēra!"

(Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread)

> kā darbojas estētiskā sfēra

Salātīgi, es pieņemu?

(Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread)

:D prātīgi, actually

(Reply to this) (Parent)