Ehm... 'There’s no research showing makeup causes acne'
Kas tad ir viss šis - https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=comedogenicity ja ne research?


Paklikināju tālāk.. emm, šī lapa stāsta, ka 'retinolu pa dienu nevar smērēt' ir mīts jo 'spf no visa pasargās'. SPF nav tik visvarens. Retinols _kas ir sunskrīnu sastāvā_ ir potenciāls kancerogēns. (ASV saka ka ir - https://ntp.niehs.nih.gov/ntp/htdocs/lt_rpts/tr568_508.pdf Eiropa nav gluži pārliecināta, ka peļu modelis attiecas arī uz cilvēkiem, bet virkne problēmu tāpat pastāv - http://ec.europa.eu/health/scientific_committees/consumer_safety/docs/sccs_o_199.pdf )

The same type of in-depth scientific research used to create this article is also used to formulate Paula’s Choice Skincare products.... Tb 'fikss pārskrējiens, lai tik atbalstītu mūsu vienīgo viedokli, ka katrs patiesībā ir unikāla sniegpārsliņa tāpēc nevajag nekam ticēt'? ir in-depth scientific research?

(Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread)

njā, tas ir tāds a long stretch, jo rekur pat acne.org raksta, ka ir a speacial kind of acne - "cosmetic induced acne is so widespread that it has its own name, acne cosmetica".

un par otro es te arī paskatījos - tā kā jā, un tā kā beigās to retinyl palmitate nemaz neizmanto eiropā?
"In April 2016 the European SCCS reviewed use in other body care products. It concluded that it would not restrict pre-formed vitamin A in cosmetics because it was unlikely that these products alone would expose consumers to harmful amounts of the vitamin. But since retinyl palmitate and related ingredients are not used in European sunscreens, additional exposure from these products was not considered in the analysis." tas jau no ewg.org.

jāiesaka viņiem vispusīgi, nevis selektīvi aprakstīt, vai

(Reply to this) (Parent)