Progress

« previous entry | next entry »
Apr. 4., 2018 | 11:18 am

“What is progress? You might think that the question is so subjective and culturally relative as to be forever unanswerable. In fact, it’s one of the easier questions to answer. Most people agree that life is better than death. Health is better than sickness. Sustenance is better than hunger. Abundance is better than poverty. Peace is better than war. Safety is better than danger. Freedom is better than tyranny. Equal rights are better than bigotry and discrimination. Literacy is better than illiteracy. Knowledge is better than ignorance. Intelligence is better than dull-wittedness. Happiness is better than misery. Opportunities to enjoy family, friends, culture, and nature are better than drudgery and monotony.
All these things can be measured. If they have increased over time, that is progress. Granted, not everyone would agree on the exact list. The values are avowedly humanistic, and leave out religious, romantic, and aristocratic virtues like salvation, grace, sacredness, heroism, honor, glory, and authenticity. But most would agree that it’s a necessary start. It’s easy to extoll transcendent values in the abstract, but most people prioritize life, health, safety, literacy, sustenance, and stimulation for the obvious reason that these goods are a prerequisite to everything else. If you’re reading this, you are not dead, starving, destitute, moribund, terrified, enslaved, or illiterate, which means that you’re in no position to turn your nose up at these values—or to deny that other people should share your good fortune.”

“And here is a shocker: The world has made spectacular progress in every single measure of human well-being.”

Excerpt From: Steven Pinker. “Enlightenment Now: The Case for Reason, Science, Humanism, and Progress.”

Nabadzība
Bads
Dzīves ilgums
Karš
Slepkavības
u.t.t.

Link | ir doma | Add to Memories


Comments {49}

gnidrologs

(bez virsraksta)

from: [info]gnidrologs
date: Apr. 5., 2018 - 08:33 pm
Link

"Toties romantiskās vīzijas par izaugsmi pārbaudījumu cīņā iesaku atstāt pusaudžiem, kas ir salasījušies Džeka Londona romānus"

No savas pieredzes, protams subjektīvā skatījuma, tā paaudze, kas bija pirms mūs (~80ajos dzimuši pieauguša vecuma mileniāļi ) vecākiem bija caurmērā viedāka. Daudzi, kas bija izcietuši karu vai/un pēckara gadus, protams bija cietuši, bet man ar viņiem vienmēr likās omulīgāk, neka pat dažreiz ar vecākiem. Kaut kāda elementāra dzīves gudrība izstarojās pat no vienkāršām lauku omītēm. Ļoti šaubos, ka mūsu izlutinātā un nākamās vēl izlutinātākas paaudzes vecumdienās būs nīgri un nožēlojami, bez bērniem par kuriem priecāties un ciest un bez jēgpilni pavadītas dzīves apziņas sevī (mani ieskaitot). Bet nu tad jau redzēs. Varbut es vienkārši projicēju savu negativitāti uz kopējo sabiedrības logosu.

Atbildēt | Iepriekšējais