Hmm - I know personally about 50 people. Not really a great sample size, is it?

One particular case is the BBC journalist. Did I not give you a link? I can do so again should you require it.

If that is not enough, please visit the MHRA web page for info on adverse reactions and fatalities. Do you need a link to that, sir?

(Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread)

I had read about that journalist before. Guess what - journalists do indeed die. And if 1 out of 100 000 has a risk of dying after taking the vaccine, that 1 might as well be a journalist.

I do not know many people personally, at least to extent of being in contact with them on a regular basis. So sample size is what it is. However, my sample confirms the official statistics and risk assessment. Good enough for me.

How about you?

(Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread)

Sample size of 10? Whatever winds your clock.
We, of course, don't know about long-term effects. I will help with that by volunteering to be in the control group.

(Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread)

I knew you would throw in something new when your previous claims (vaccine kills) turn out impossible to prove. Long-term effects can and should be studied and risk accordingly assessed and managed - by doctors. Which is already being done. If you want to go on living in fear of all possible risks, good luck, I personally don't think that is any good strategy. In a long-term analysis we will all be dead anyway.

(Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread)

MHRA website in the UK

(Reply to this) (Parent)

By the way, I will get my jab next week. Let's see how I get recorded in the statistics, both official, personal, quasi-personal, or ciba-ish.

(Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread)

Enjoy your freedom: scan your QR code with happiness.

(Reply to this) (Parent)