vai nav iespējams, ka cilvēks mainās? es un methodrone (lai viņa mani palabo, ja kļūdos, bet saku to no savas atmiņas) vēl ap 2016. gadu bijām labticīgi leftiji, kam sirds lūza par brexit.

(Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread)

Man jau nav zematslēgas ierakstu, visu ko es te sc esmu teicis var izlasīt, cik nu es atceros esmu kritzējis to ko parasti sauc par woke, t.i. idejiskais vegānisms + vieglās narkotikas + palestīnisms/ islamofīlija + sociālisma idejas + pseidoekoloģija + naids pret bagātajiem utt. Kur formāli man ar viņiem domas sakrīt - viņi kritizē kristietību, es arī. Bet es kritizēju nevis kristietību atsevišķi bet reliģiju vispār, savukārt viņi selektīvi uzbrūk tieši kristietībai, islāms un visādi mistiski psihodēlismi šiem ir OK. Nu tā kautkā. Biju tehnokrāts un esmu tehnokrāts, nekādu izmaiņu.

(Reply to this) (Parent)

uz dullo uzšķīru savu ž. 2016 gadā, izskatās ka par krievbiju neesmu bijis sajūsmā :D

http://klab.lv/users/ctulhu/89879.html

(Reply to this) (Parent)

True :D

(Reply to this) (Parent)

Ne viņa tautības, it īpaši, ja uzkrītoši labi redzi the underlyingn agenda. Stratēģiska kažoka mešana nav naivas labticības izpausme.

Ar viņu un viņam radniecīgajiem man ir precīzi šis xperience.

“The more I argued with them, the more I got to know their dialectics. First they counted on the ignorance of their adversary; then, when there was no way out, they themselves pretended stupidity. If all this was of no avail, they refused to understand or they changed the subject
when driven into a corner; they brought up truisms, but they immediately transferred their acceptance to quite
different subjects, and, if attacked again, they gave way and pretended to know nothing exactly. Wherever one attacked one of these prophets, one's hands seized slimy jelly; it slipped through one's fingers only to collect again in the next moment. If one smote one of them so thoroughly that, with the bystanders watching, he could but agree, and if one thus thought he had advanced at least one step, one was greatly astonished the following day. The Jew did not in the least remember the day before, he continued to talk in the same old strain as if nothing had happened, and if indignantly confronted, he pretended to be astonished and could not remember anything except that his assertions
had already been proved true the day before.
Often I was stunned. One did not know what to admire more: their glibness of
tongue or their skill in lying.
I gradually began to hate them.”

(Reply to this) (Parent)