Līdz šim labākais lasītais komentārs par Brektes murāli nāk no Julia Robinson:

I just looked up the mural (am I right it is the one that has erotic overtones near a school and parents are worried it will traumatise their children?)
I feel this conversation has nothing to do with art. The art is good enough. It's got pleasant composition. It has naked people and a woman in a bed.
I am a teacher and also work within the art world, so I have experienced a little of both.
To me the problem here seems to be the parents who don't understand that children if they don't get it, don't see it, and those that get it actually probably have seen so much more on Netflix, it read in books. Are parents scared of their children having sexuality? Have the parents been traumatised by their own sexuality that they are presuming that sex is scandalous? I have more experience in teaching and art than sex in Latvia, bit the experience I have had is that there is not a lot of communication in the sexual world and that itself creates and maintains trauma.
An art piece only symbolises, it can't create trauma, but it can bring out conversation.
Go latvians, let's communicate about difficult things, it is healing.

man nepatīk reklāmas pilsētvidē, pilnīgi visas - man gribas vemt no reklāmu murāļiem, pretīgas arhitektūras, kam slīd nost lēti dekoratīvi paneļi, vietām, kuras aplīmētas ar rakstainām līmplēvēm, kas izskatās sūdīgāk par vecu vaskadrānu, no Galerijas Rīga strūklakas ar mēļajiem prožektoriņiem, kas pievilina sīkos, no neironiskas junk space atmosfēras utt. bet es eju, ciešu un samierinos, jo tipa kādam to vajag.