tāpat arvien atgriežos pie pessoa. kas bija šis neparastais cilvēks? pirmais somatiskais poētiķis. vai post-metafiziķis. vai neirozinātnes pravietis. pirmā spuldzīte, kas spīdēja plaisā starp valodu un ķermeni? :
I believe in the world as in a daisy,
Because I see it. But I don’t think about it, Because to think is to not understand.
I believe in the world as in a daisy,
Because I see it. But I don’t think about it, Because to think is to not understand.
Comments
RL pirms kāda laika bija rakstiņš: https://www.rigaslaiks.lv/zurnals/mekle jot-personas-kungu-1676
(Reply to this) (Thread)
to rakstiņu es atceros, bet diemžēl jāsaka, ka tas nedod nekādu priekšstatu par to pasauli, kurā tu iegrimsti, atverot kādu no viņa miljons grāmatām
(Reply to this) (Parent)
“Aspects of autism, for instance, might be characterized by an inability to ignore prediction errors relating to sensory signals at the lowest levels of the brain’s processing hierarchy. That could lead to a preoccupation with sensations, a need for repetition and predictability, sensitivity to certain illusions, and other effects. The reverse might be true in conditions that are associated with hallucinations, like schizophrenia: The brain may pay too much attention to its own predictions about what is going on and not enough to sensory information that contradicts those predictions. ”
Tas ir tas, kas, piemēram, klausoties džezu, iesit pa smadzenēm, tā vilinošā it kā paredzamība, bet tad - bams, cita nots.
(Reply to this) (Thread)