Comments
![[info]](http://klab.lv/img/userinfo.gif){kind=small}
es nemācēšu definēt jo man nav pietiekamu teorētisku zināšanu, tikai spēcīga sajūta
“Why is female vulnerability still only acceptable when it’s neuroticized and personal; when it feeds back on itself? Why do people still not get it when we handle vulnerability like philosophy, at some remove?” (no grāmatas)
“Why is female vulnerability still only acceptable when it’s neuroticized and personal; when it feeds back on itself? Why do people still not get it when we handle vulnerability like philosophy, at some remove?” (no grāmatas)
(Reply to this) (Parent)