![[info]](http://klab.lv/img/userinfo.gif)
“Why is female vulnerability still only acceptable when it’s neuroticized and personal; when it feeds back on itself? Why do people still not get it when we handle vulnerability like philosophy, at some remove?” (no grāmatas)
atmiņas par domām | |
|
![]() “Why is female vulnerability still only acceptable when it’s neuroticized and personal; when it feeds back on itself? Why do people still not get it when we handle vulnerability like philosophy, at some remove?” (no grāmatas) Reply |