slikts sapnis - [entries|archive|friends|userinfo]
slikts

[ website | untu.ms ]
[ userinfo | sc userinfo ]
[ archive | journal archive ]

[Jun. 27th, 2007|06:49 pm]
Previous Entry Add to Memories Tell A Friend Next Entry
You scored as Existentialist, Existentialism emphasizes human capability. There is no greater power interfering with life and thus it is up to us to make things happen. Sometimes considered a negative and depressing world view, your optimism towards human accomplishment is immense. Mankind is condemned to be free and must accept the responsibility.

Existentialist

94%

Materialist

81%

Modernist

63%

Idealist

56%

Postmodernist

44%

Cultural Creative

38%

Fundamentalist

31%

Romanticist

25%

What is Your World View?
created with QuizFarm.com
Linkdot krepsi

Comments:
[User Picture]
From:[info]artis
Date:June 27th, 2007 - 07:10 pm

tie jautājumi ir nepatīkami dumbed down

(Link)
You scored as Materialist, Materialism stresses the essence of fundamental particles. Everything that exists is purely physical matter and there is no special force that holds life together. You believe that anything can be explained by breaking it up into its pieces. i.e. the big picture can be understood by its smaller elements.

Materialist

100%

Modernist

94%

Existentialist

88%

Postmodernist

75%

Idealist

56%

Fundamentalist

44%

Romanticist

31%

Cultural Creative

31%

What is Your World View?
created with QuizFarm.com
[User Picture]
From:[info]artis
Date:June 27th, 2007 - 07:21 pm
(Link)
iemācījies kottabos?
[User Picture]
From:[info]artis
Date:June 27th, 2007 - 07:28 pm

ko tu te liec?

(Link)
From:[info]slikts
Date:June 27th, 2007 - 07:30 pm

Re: ko tu te liec?

(Link)
[User Picture]
From:[info]artis
Date:June 27th, 2007 - 07:34 pm

Re: ko tu te liec?

(Link)
From:[info]larva
Date:June 27th, 2007 - 08:31 pm
(Link)
You scored as a Postmodernist
Postmodernism is the belief in complete open interpretation. You see the universe as a collection of information with varying ways of putting it together. There is no absolute truth for you; even the most hardened facts are open to interpretation. Meaning relies on context and even the language you use to describe things should be subject to analysis.

Existentialist
63%

Postmodernist
63%

Cultural Creative
56%

Modernist
44%

Materialist
44%

Idealist
44%

Fundamentalist
31%

Romanticist
25%




From:[info]larva
Date:June 27th, 2007 - 08:41 pm
(Link)
katrā ziņā esmu daudz vairāk dubitatīvs nekā jūs :)
From:[info]slikts
Date:June 27th, 2007 - 08:48 pm
(Link)
[User Picture]
From:[info]artis
Date:June 27th, 2007 - 09:11 pm
(Link)
mans postmodernisms — 75%
tavs postmodernisms — 63%

ergo, mums visa kā ir vairāk
From:[info]larva
Date:June 27th, 2007 - 09:20 pm
(Link)
vairāk -ismu :)
[User Picture]
From:[info]artis
Date:June 27th, 2007 - 09:27 pm
(Link)
šizismu!
From:[info]slikts
Date:June 27th, 2007 - 09:29 pm
(Link)
I have approximate answers and possible beliefs and different degrees of certainty about different things, but I'm not absolutely sure of anything. (Richard Feynman)
[User Picture]
From:[info]artis
Date:June 27th, 2007 - 09:31 pm
(Link)
par pāris lietām jau pilnīgi mierīgi viņš varēja būt drošs
From:[info]slikts
Date:June 27th, 2007 - 09:39 pm
(Link)
absolūti drošs?
[User Picture]
From:[info]artis
Date:June 27th, 2007 - 09:46 pm
(Link)
jā, absolūti drošs. tā nav frāze, kas bullim ir sarkans karodziņš, nelec uz ecesām
tev nav bažu par telpas virsmu, pretējā gadījumā tu esi zem LSD, vai hospitalizējams
From:[info]slikts
Date:June 27th, 2007 - 09:59 pm
(Link)
es neesmu absolūti pārliecināts, bet man tas arī nerūp kā tu saki; es vienkārši uzticos, ka realitāte darbojas pēc kaut kādiem konstantiem likumiem. par cogito, ergo sum es arī neesmu absolūti, bet tikai dziļi pārliecināts. ja tu vari pateikt, kāpēc es varētu būt par to vai kaut ko citu absolūti drošs, es klausīšos.
[User Picture]
From:[info]artis
Date:June 27th, 2007 - 10:03 pm
(Link)
ja tu neesi absolūti, tad esi mazliet drošs? vari izmērīt, kā feinmans, the degree of certainty?
From:[info]slikts
Date:June 27th, 2007 - 10:05 pm
(Link)
protams
From:[info]slikts
Date:June 27th, 2007 - 10:04 pm
(Link)
es to iedomājos šitā:
[pilnīgs solipsisms ———————————————————————————————————————————————————————— objektīvas zināšanas]
                                                                       ^
                                                                       es
tos atlikušos pāris soļus nevar pielikt maņu dēļ, jo tu neuztver realitāti tieši. tik pat labi viss var būt kaut kāds matrikss.
From:[info]larva
Date:June 27th, 2007 - 10:06 pm
(Link)
"tikpat" raksta kopā
[User Picture]
From:[info]artis
Date:June 27th, 2007 - 10:08 pm
(Link)
ūūū, tad jau vajag brilles? :)
From:[info]slikts
Date:June 27th, 2007 - 10:09 pm
(Link)
šat ap, ja tu nesaproti.
From:[info]slikts
Date:June 27th, 2007 - 10:17 pm
(Link)
[————————————————————————————————————————————————————————]
  ^
pauls, uzbrūkot dokinsam

[————————————————————————————————————————————————————————]
                                                        ^
                                  pauls, kad viņu kāds, piemēram, iesūdzētu tiesā

[User Picture]
From:[info]artis
Date:June 27th, 2007 - 10:09 pm
(Link)
bet par to, ka tu nomirsi, par to tu šaubies?
From:[info]slikts
Date:June 27th, 2007 - 10:10 pm
(Link)
tas ir ievads trollēšanai?
[User Picture]
From:[info]artis
Date:June 27th, 2007 - 10:12 pm
(Link)
vienkārši atzīsti, ka tā ir neveiksmīgi aptuvena doma, tas citāts
From:[info]slikts
Date:June 27th, 2007 - 10:16 pm
(Link)
tas tev vēl ir jāparāda
[User Picture]
From:[info]artis
Date:June 27th, 2007 - 10:20 pm
(Link)
iedomājies aksiomātisku sistēmu, kuru vada klasiskās loģikas kārtulas. par ko tur šaubīties? es neesmu par absolūtu nešaubību, bet pret absolūtām šaubām.
From:[info]slikts
Date:June 27th, 2007 - 10:21 pm
(Link)
tad tu esi pret kaut ko, ko neviens nav teicis.
[User Picture]
From:[info]artis
Date:June 27th, 2007 - 10:23 pm
(Link)
pēc kā tad izklausās "I'm not absolutely sure of anything."?
From:[info]slikts
Date:June 27th, 2007 - 10:27 pm
(Link)
pēc tā, ka tu tajā zīmējumā augstāk nekad neesi labajā pusē līdz pašam galam.
[User Picture]
From:[info]artis
Date:June 27th, 2007 - 10:31 pm
(Link)
tas ir par observable phenomena, ne deduktīviem slēdzieniem.
From:[info]slikts
Date:June 27th, 2007 - 10:33 pm
(Link)
es tagad sapratu
[User Picture]
From:[info]artis
Date:June 27th, 2007 - 10:39 pm
(Link)
manu kāju!
From:[info]slikts
Date:June 27th, 2007 - 11:11 pm
(Link)
es sapratu, ko tu domā, bet tu pirms tam kā piemēru paņēmi materiālo realitāti, un tāpēc es arī runāju par objektīvām zināšanām.
[User Picture]
From:[info]artis
Date:June 27th, 2007 - 09:51 pm
(Link)
skat. kategorisks siloģisms
From:[info]slikts
Date:June 27th, 2007 - 09:59 pm
(Link)
skat, kāja!
[User Picture]
From:[info]artis
Date:June 27th, 2007 - 10:03 pm
(Link)
skaistas kājas!
[User Picture]
From:[info]artis
Date:June 27th, 2007 - 09:35 pm
(Link)
ā, to var lasīt arī savādāk. nekas īpašs, parasta tantes pasaka
From:[info]slikts
Date:June 27th, 2007 - 09:39 pm
(Link)
tantes pasaka mana kāja