Dusmu funkcija laikam ir aizsardzība, vienīgais, ka cilvēki baidās no pārāk daudzām lietām, no kurām nebūtu jābaidās. Un Bhagavadgītā Krišna kā pirmo dievišķās dabas īpašību nosauc bezbailību. Nu neizdarīja man neko tas Nefolks ar saviem ignorantajiem spriedumiem par mani un manu meitu, es uz viņu tiešām ļoti sadusmojos. Bet no otras puses - es sadusmotos arī otrreiz, ja būtu tāda pati situācija. Ja tu nekad nedusmojies, tev vnk sāks kāpt arvien vairāk uz galvas - tā cilvēki dara.

(Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread)

tad, lai to apturētu, vajag skatīties uz otru un domāt: viņš ir daļa no manis un es esmu daļa no viņa. ienīstot viņu, es ienīstu šo savu dziļi nobāzto aspektu. vai ne. patiecoties viņam, es beidzot esmu ieraudzījis, ko tieši es esmu nobāzis. paldies.

(Reply to this) (Parent)

The problem with this is that the Lightworker movement was co-opted. Forms of active resistance and productive action were discouraged and replaced with admonishments for passive 'love' and 'forgiveness' which in actuality achieve nothing. Please note, I am not disparaging love and forgiveness in any way, shape or form. However, these things are not substitutes for action, and action is what is required.

There are many ways to resist, and there are many ways to be productive and bring about positive change. It's not necessary that everyone picks up a sword and lops off some heads to fix the problem here. Those people who abhor violence and seek non-violent means of change are not bad people, but this also doesn't mean that those people who are willing to utilize force to achieve change are bad or doing it wrong.

(Reply to this) (Parent)

Force is being used against us. The ones who are attempting to create, maintain, and spread the paradigm of dominance and submission, hierarchy, and tyranny are absolutely not averse to using any means necessary to succeed. Non-violent resistance is certainly warranted where it is possible for it to succeed, but sometimes the only way to prevent tyranny is to force the tyrants to go away, or remove that tyrant from existence altogether. Sometimes, someone who isn't afraid to get bloody is necessary to defend against enemies who know full well how to use violence against good people.

Who would you rather have do that defense? Someone who was born for it and who views it as a natural exercising of their inborn skills, or someone who abhors that duty and would seek any way to avoid it? Warriors exist so that those who prefer non-violence don't have to make that choice - we will step forward and ensure that those who seek peace are free to live in peace.

http://www.silverlegion.org/index.html

(Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread)

īsti neiebraucu, ko tieši tu domāji ar pēdējo teikumu, varbūt daļēji sapratu. nav runa par domu gaitas ietekmēšanu. es teorētiski zinu tās lietas, ko tu piemini. vai vismaz kaut ko līdzīgu. man vnk patīk runāt par tēmu. un tu esi sen neredzēts, sakarīgs cilvēks.

(Reply to this) (Parent)

Manā blogā pēdējā laikā ļoti reti komentē sakarīgi cilvēki. Agrāk bija savādāk (pirms dažiem gadiem). Tagad tikai heiteri pa lielam un reptiliāņi.

(Reply to this) (Parent)