05 May 2015 @ 10:08 pm
morisejs, hipokraati, deadearth  
"Dear Mr. Gore and Mr. Wall,

I am writing to ask you to do the one thing that will do the most good for the planet and the majority of its inhabitants: not serve meat or dairy products at Live Earth 2015. I don’t mean offering a vegan option – I mean not serving animal products at all. Otherwise, the event will make no sense – it’ll be “greenwashing.” Serving meat and dairy products at an event to combat climate change is like selling pistols at a gun-control rally. Your responsibility is to alert people to a crisis, not sell out to the vendors responsible for it.

Not only is it possible for venues to provide a 100 per cent meat-free menu – as is done now at every concert venue in which I perform, including Madison Square Garden, where I have a show at the end of June – it’s also a moral duty.

We already know that raising animals for food is a leading cause of climate change and that moving toward a vegan diet is necessary to combat climate change’s worst effects. Animal agriculture severely affects the world’s freshwater supply and is a major contributor to global greenhouse gas emissions, deforestation, loss of biodiversity, and air and water pollution, among many other harmful effects.

Since you can’t miss the fact that meat consumption is killing the planet-your own sponsor organisation, the United Nations, states this – and since venues can and will cater vegan food for events, if you choose to serve animal flesh at Live Earth, you’ll be making a mockery of the very concept of the event, in which case it should be renamed “Dead Earth: We Contributed!”

Don’t be a denier of the causes of climate change. You know the facts. Make the right choice.

Sincerely, Morrissey"

kaa miljons cilveeku priekshaa var buut tik resni hipokraati?
 
 
( Post a new comment )
[info]methodrone on May 10th, 2015 - 05:42 pm
jaa, es runaaju par senseno un freaking kaitinosho 'viss ir saprotams', jo visam ir izskaidrojums. viss savaa iznjaa ir logjisks, jo visam ir izskaidrojums. pasaulee nav nekaa nelogjiska, kameer eksistee its causal variables. taapeec es nevaru ne pret ko dumpoties, jo technically VISS ir logjisks, arii perspektiivas un attieksmes, kas ir destruktiivas. un tieshi taapeec kaut kas pasaulee vispaar notiek.

un kaadas man ir tiesiibas teikt, ka mani uzskati ir logjiskaaki par citu uzskatiem? based on what? man eetika (un vispaar tolerance) vienmeer ir shkjitusi the ultimate challenge filozofijaa.
(Reply) (Parent) (Thread) (Link)
(Anonymous) on May 10th, 2015 - 07:34 pm
Tieši tā, es arī netaisos pretendēt ētiku skaidrot no loģiskā, pragmātiskā un utilitārā skatupunkta. Man liekas, gan dzīvnieku, gan jebkuras citas būtnes gadījumā runa vienkārši ir paplašinātu eksistenciālās solidaritātes un empātijas/līdzcietības loku. Rūpes un kopābūšana. Attiecīgi, ētiskā pozīcija ir rūpīgā (nevis nepieciešami loģiskā) un neētiskā tad būtu bezrūpīgā.
(Reply) (Parent) (Link)