Consciousness Developments

Nu karoče, pāris stundas atpakaļi biju krimiķu iecirknī Gaujas ielas 17.
Mani uzrunāja acīmredzami homoseksuāls jauns puika (23-25)(inspektors Šmits lol), kurš drīz atklāja, ka mana izsaukuma iemesls esot "antisemītisms". Aizgājām uz viņa vai drīzāk citu kabinetiņu un tur ienāca brūngana meitenīti, kas pat neizskatījās pēc latvietes un bija labi ja 20 gadus veca. Sāka man bārstīt vēl tupāku propagandu. Uz maniem jautājumiem par ko tieši esmu izsaukts uz iecirkni, neko nespēj atbildēt. Es sāku agresīvi troļļot un dirst virsū. Viņi man uzklāj uz galda kaut kādas 8 lapas ar random tekstu un saka "iepazīsties ar savām tiesībām"

Es saku "par kādām tiesībām iet runa"

Protams nav atbildes. Sāku trolllēt vēl vairāk un tur ierodas kaut kāda vecāka vecene, kas laikam saprot vairāk un man palūdz atstāt telpas. Karoče pasūtīja mani dirst. Nesaprata kā sodīt par antisemītismu. Es btw "inspektoram Šmitam" (jā, libšits, ar kuru runāju tiešām bija uzvārdā šmits) skaidroju, ka Izraļu apdzīvojošie aškenazi žīdi ir tikai 10-15 ģenētiski "ēbreji", tikmēr tauta (palestīņi) kuru aškenazi žīdi metodiski slepkavo ir teju 100% semīti. Viņam, protams acis kā bļodas un totāls apjukums.

Jautājums, kurš no Cibas stučīja? Jo obvious, ka no Cibas. Vai nu Boris Štrumfs aka Ctulhu aka mazu bērnu varotājs. Otrs vartiants c00fid19 kaut kāds tur Aivairs vai kas viņš tur? Mindbound aka Arets Paeglis tr sen nav bijis.


Varianti stukačam?

Dostojevskis teica: "Kad cilvēki pārstās ticēt Dievam, tie sāks ticēt visam"

Kad pirmo reizi parsēju šo frāzi, likās vai nu kriptiska huiņa vai tipiska konservatarda ramblings

Tad es uzzināju par furrijiem

paranormal romance

e-pārvaldnieks galīgi jobnulsja
dubultkodus viņiem, lai nosūtītu ūdens rādītājus
nē, nu moš viņus tur noskamoja kāds
un kāpēc rezultātā traģiskais hamlets tagad esmu es

security systems solutions no sfēras
ja jūs uzlauž vienreiz - rakstiet divas paroles
ja jūs uzlauž divreiz - rakstiet trīs

valstī pilns ar IT speciālistiem saucas

At one time they were psychopathic raiders ("kill them all, men, women, children and goats" as per many Bible bits), quite comparable to the Yanomamo or other violent, vicious tribes like that.

Quite possibly they were initially comprised of an agglomeration of outcasts and criminals, as the Egyptian "Habiru" etymology suggests, if that has any weight (although ofc that's open to debate). When more settled they were normal criminals and gangsters - e.g. as per the story of Abraham, extortionists and pimps.

Eventually they became relatively big cheeses in their local area (Judea), then they got stomped on by bigger, more civilized cultures (other Semitic and Aryan peoples), and in captivity, as per Nietzsche, their leaders developed a slave mentality based on lying to get ahead, presenting an ever so 'umble, eternal victim front, with dreams of glory and world domination behind that facade, and that's the general character their people took on over time.

But they still have that vicious, violent character underneath (e.g. cf. how all the Holocauast stuff is pure projection - it never happened but it represents the fantasy life of how Jews would like to treat others, and have always treated others if and when they've gotten a measure of political and military power, as in pre-Stalinist Soviet Russia, as in Israel today).

Tramps tiešām apsēsts ar papildus Epšteina failu izlaišanas bloķēšanu. Ņemot vērā, ka tur tāpat 2/3 būs [redacted], viņa apsēstība ir īpaši implicējoša kā viņam pašam tā viņa žīdu draugiem. Ordeni Tomasam Masijam.

I think the real question is what ISN'T an illness according to the modern field of psychology?

Because what is happening here is that due to the materialist and deterministic world view of modernity, where morality and free will are not acknowledged as true concrete realities, anything that "diverges" from whatever is supposed to be the standard for neuronormativity is ipso facto an "illness". It's not a matter of determining what constitutes a real illness (and to be sure there are illnesses out there) and what constitutes a moral failing, since the latter possibility is excluded a priori.

Thus, a serial killer, someone who takes pleasure in the act of killing others, is affected by some kind of "disorder" as opposed to possessing a demonic and deviated soul.