23 Septembris 2012 @ 01:33
 
"Drugs are tested by the people who manufacture them, in poorly designed trials, on hopelessly small numbers of weird, unrepresentative patients, and analysed using techniques that are flawed by design, in such a way that they exaggerate the benefits of treatments. [...] In their 40 years of practice after leaving medical school, doctors hear about what works ad hoc, from sales reps, colleagues and journals. But those colleagues can be in the pay of drug companies – often undisclosed – and the journals are, too. And so are the patient groups. And finally, academic papers, which everyone thinks of as objective, are often covertly planned and written by people who work directly for the companies, without disclosure. Sometimes whole academic journals are owned outright by one drug company. Aside from all this, for several of the most important and enduring problems in medicine, we have no idea what the best treatment is, because it's not in anyone's financial interest to conduct any trials at all."

http://www.guardian.co.uk/business/2012/sep/21/drugs-industry-scandal-ben-goldacre
 
 
( Post a new comment )
_zirgs[info]_zirgs on 25. Septembris 2012 - 21:09
Pag, raksta autors ir ārsts, kas raksturo to, kā visa sajātā sistēma viņu un pacientu apčakarēja... Tad Tu peidāvā palikt pie tā paša?

Cik ārstu, tavuprāt, ir pilnībā kompetenti par farmakoloģijas jaunākajiem atklājumiem? nu reāli - ārsts taču nav ķīmiķis un nez vai no kaut kāda jocīga jauna nosaukuma viņš sapratīs, kur un kā tā zāle iedarbojas.

Un tad ja pacients seko līdz tam, ko viņš dzer. hmm... vēl labāk. Kur gan Tu - pacients -, piemēram, iegūsti sev nepieciešamo info? Cik daudz no tās Tu ķer? Vai Tu tiešām saproti? Pat ja Tu uzzini kas tā par vielu, kā gan bez trialiem Tu vari zināt, ko tā dara? nevari, tādēļ jau tos rīko.

Nepiekrītu, ka ārsts un pacients ir spējīgi vieni tikt galā ar maldu info.

Es iesaku regulas, ierobežojumus no starptautiskām organizācijām, kas nosaka to, ka ir tā vai šitā. Izpratni, ka, tā kā tā vairs nevar turpināties, ir jāmaina shēma.
Kaut kā globālāk jādarbojas, lai nav dažas 'tīrās' dažas 'netīrās' farmkompānijas.
(Atbildēt) (Iepriekšējais) (Link)