 |
|
![[info]](http://klab.lv/img/userinfo.gif) gnidrologs | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
How The Jews Forced America Into World War II (by William Anderson)Jews were obviously willing to back up their threats, for the London
"Sunday Chronicle" of 2 Jan. 1938 reported that "leaders of Interna-
tional Jewry" had met in Geneva, Switzerland to set up a $2.5
BILLION fund to undermine the economic stability of Germany.
However, Jewish boycotts against Germany failed to bring that na-
tion to its knees as Hitler had already freed Germany from dependence
on Jewish usury. Since economic pressure by World Jewry could not
break the back of Germany, it was determined that an actual war
would be necessary to destroy Hitler.
This desire to decimate Germany is understandable when one
recognizes that Jews are a parasitic race and as parasites will fight to
the death when the host attempts to expell them.
The Jewish desire for war was admitted to by Rabbi Felix
Mendelsohn in the Chicago "Sentinel" of 8 Oct. 1942 where he states:
"The Second World War is being fought for the defense of the fun-
damentals of Judaism." Thus, Rabbi Mendelsohn flatly expresses the
view that WWII was a Jewish war.
....
And it is Jewry which best recognizes why the U.S. entered WWII.
"The American Hebrew," in an editorial of 24 July 1942, declared that
"whenever an American or a Filipino fell at Bataan or Corregidor or at
any other of the now historic spots where MacArthur's men put up
their remarkable fight, their survivors could have said with truth: the
real reason that boy went to his death was because Hitler's anti-semitic
movement succeeded in Germany."
The above quotation from a Jew newspaper is an admission that
the U.S. entered WWII only at the behest of World Jewry — a war
Jewry declared all the way back in 1933! Of course, this admission was
intended only for consumption by a Jewish audience to keep them in
the know, which tends to make it all the more revealing.
Any American involvement in a foreign conflict should be judged
as to whether it is in the best interest of the American nation; yet the
U.S. entered WWII because it was in the best interest of International
Jewry.
Thus, the Jews forced the U.S. into war against the public's will in
1941 and the $64 million question is will it happen again? Events are
already pointing towards a build-up of war hysteria. Without a doubt,
Jewry is leading America by the nose towards war in the Middle East
on behalf of the bandit state of Israel.
Will we learn from the lessons of the past or will we once again find
ourselves forced into war for the benefit of World Jewry?
( viss texc )
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ulvs | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kā es strādāju ar jauniem skatu punktiem, idejām, ko nespēju pieņemt/saprast: - Apzinos, ka daudz ko nezinu un/vai nesaprotu. Apzinos, ka claude.ai man var adekvātā līmenī paskaidrot to, ko nesaprotu (tas parasti ir 1. solis, jo padziļinātu info meklēju avotos). Vados pēc idejas "aptuvenas zināšanas ir labākas par šo zināšanu neesamību". Tas ir pirmais solis, kas daudziem nekad nepienāk.
- Iepazīstos ar pamata informāciju par nesaprotamo tēmu X vai Y. Definīciju un kopsavilkumu.
- Apziņā par šo tēmu formējas pagaidu viedoklis-hipotēze. Integrēju to savā uztverē/domāšanā, lai pārbaudītu, kā tas darbojas praksē. Ar "pārbaudītu praksē" domāju gan burtiksi, gan izmantojot šo infu kā mentālaiso framework, kurā konstruēt/vizualizēt šo vai no tās tēmas atvasinātus atzarus.
- Pat ja pēc "prakses" secinu, ka hipotēze nekļūst par tēzi, darbošanās info inducētā paralēlā mentālā freimworkā uzlabo apziņas izšķirtspēju un t.s. "headroom". Jo vairāk paralēlas pasaules spēj vizualizēt/apzināt, jo lielāks ir tava skatījuma izsķirtspējas (resolution) potenciāls - sniedzot tev iespēju pāris sekundēs iziet cauri visam spektram - no mikroskopiska hiperfokusa, līdz kosmiska apjoma "lielajai bildei" un atpakaļ. Kā augšā, tā apakšā (as above, so below).
Esmu ļoti pateicīgs, ka man dzīvē bija iespēja studēt jurisprudenci, jo šī disciplīna attīstīja to, kas man nebija iepriekš - domas (relatīva) stabilitāte, aukstasinīga funkcija pāri formai rakstīšana, strādāšana ar info, loģikas ķēdes (pateicoties kāzusu risināšanai), utt.
Mūziķim vissvarīgāk savu ēterisko pasauli balansēt ar eksakto vai cita veida disciplīnu. Pretēji risks, ka plūsmas enerģijas aizpludinās viņa patību līdz nepazīšanai. Manuprāt, vissvarīgākais ir iemācīties pārslēgties no racionālā uz stihisko cilvēku, un atpakaļ. Tad mūziķis nodara sev vismazāk pāri (tūrēšanas pieredzes paliek mūzikas lauciņā un netiek jauktas kopā ar "racionālo" es). Pēdējos 2 teikumus rakstu no salīdzinoši naiva skatu punkta (smaidu).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Previous 
(WOW SO UBER)