caur slašdot -
If It Feels Good to Be Good, It Might Be Only Natural
The results were showing that when the volunteers placed the interests of others before their own, the generosity activated a primitive part of the brain that usually lights up in response to food or sex. Altruism, the experiment suggested, was not a superior moral faculty that suppresses basic selfish urges but rather was basic to the brain, hard-wired and pleasurable.
The more researchers learn, the more it appears that the foundation of morality is empathy.
One experiment found that if each time a rat is given food, its neighbor receives an electric shock, the first rat will eventually forgo eating.
The research enterprise has been viewed with interest by philosophers and theologians, but already some worry that it raises troubling questions. Reducing morality and immorality to brain chemistry -- rather than free will -- might diminish the importance of personal responsibility.
Hauser said that if his theory is right, there should be aspects of morality that are automatic and unconscious -- just like language. People would reach moral conclusions in the same way they construct a sentence without having been trained in linguistics. Hauser said the idea could shed light on contradictions in common moral stances.
If It Feels Good to Be Good, It Might Be Only Natural
The results were showing that when the volunteers placed the interests of others before their own, the generosity activated a primitive part of the brain that usually lights up in response to food or sex. Altruism, the experiment suggested, was not a superior moral faculty that suppresses basic selfish urges but rather was basic to the brain, hard-wired and pleasurable.
The more researchers learn, the more it appears that the foundation of morality is empathy.
One experiment found that if each time a rat is given food, its neighbor receives an electric shock, the first rat will eventually forgo eating.
The research enterprise has been viewed with interest by philosophers and theologians, but already some worry that it raises troubling questions. Reducing morality and immorality to brain chemistry -- rather than free will -- might diminish the importance of personal responsibility.
Hauser said that if his theory is right, there should be aspects of morality that are automatic and unconscious -- just like language. People would reach moral conclusions in the same way they construct a sentence without having been trained in linguistics. Hauser said the idea could shed light on contradictions in common moral stances.
man bija kkas iebilstams pret šito they construct a sentence without having been trained in linguistics, bet es neatceros, kas, jo es esmu veiksmīgi izlādējusi visus konspektus, hahaha.
Reply