Заметки алкоголика и придурка

15. Februāris 2017

11:02

накатить

12:50

Lai precizētu iepriekšējo postu. Diegabikšu slimība, kas piemeklējusi Rietumus - kārētējā izpausme. Jo diena, jo trakāk:

Canada is inching toward a broadly-based law that would codify “Islamophobia” as a hate crime without even defining Islamophobia or demonstrating that it is a phenomenon requiring legal action.

After first passing a motion that condemns Islamophobia, last month, Iqra Khalid, a Member of Parliament (MP) from the governing Liberals, tabled Motion M-103 in the House of Commons. The motion demands that Islamophobia be treated as a crime without even bothering to define the offense.

Thomas Mulcair, the leader of the leftist New Democrat Party, read the first motion in the House of Commons:

“Mr. Speaker, in a moment I will be seeking unanimous consent for an important motion based on the e-petition sponsored by the Hon. Member for Pierrefonds–Dollard that asks that we, the House of Commons, condemn all forms of Islamophobia,” Mulcair said.

Though he did not receive the unanimous consent that he craved because some official opposition Conservative MPs shouted, “Nay,” Mulcair’s motion passed. No mainstream media outlet reported this parliamentary activity; some social media blogs and private news websites discussed the motion.

Then last month, Liberal MP Khalid introduced another more comprehensive motion that “the government should recognize the need to quell the increasing public climate of hate and fear… condemn Islamophobia and all forms of systemic racism and religious discrimination and take note of House of Commons’ petition e-411 and the issues raised by it…and request that the Standing Committee on Canadian Heritage undertake a study.”

Khalid recommends that Islamophobia — whatever that is — be treated as a hate crime by the federal government and that it “collect data to contextualize hate crime reports and to conduct needs assessments for impacted communities.”

This motion was tabled for debate. Khalid’s communications assistant, Anas Marwah, told The Daily Caller that they expect the motion to come up for discussion in a couple of weeks. “The motion has technically not been introduced, but just tabled; it may be up for first reading in early February,” he said.

The motion has received virtually no mention in the mainstream media…….

16:23

Veltīts jūzerim

pinjons, kuru es kinda mīlu, bet kurš ir nelabojams liberasts, kas nav ieēdis sarkanās kapsulas pietiekamā daudzumā.

In an angry interview with his native Lithuanian press, Arminas’ father said he hadn’t even been approached for interviews by the Swedish press after the death of his son, while the same Swedish media rushed to interview the father of the killer. He said in Lithuania the migrant problem was frankly and openly discussed, whilein Sweden “everything is being kept hidden”.

This week the mainstream left-wing paper Aftonbladet published a sympathetic interview with the father of the 14 year old migrant killer who accused the dead boy of not defending the teenage girl, but instead beign guilty of bullying his migrant classmate. In a remarkable admission of the alien culture the accused came from, the father of the “Arab student” told the paper the school had done nothing in the wake of the altercation in December:

“The school did nothing to help him and establish his honour. Instead, my son had to meet this 15 year old every day. It made him very upset”.

Aftonbladet did not question whether hurt honour was a sufficient reason for killing a classmate, nor did it report on the teenage girl Arminas is said to have lost his life over or the Syrian origin of the suspected killer.

What a miserable shitty country.

[IMG]

23:48

Ir fenomenāli noskatīties kā feministes, kuras spēj nopietni bļaurēt par pilnīgu bullšitu aļa ''mansplaining'' no emaskulēto Eiropas vīrietīšu puses (kas kas jau tā viņas nesā uz rokām un bučo papēžus), bet tajā pašā laikā kā maigi šuneļi luncina astītes akmens laikmeta patriarhāļu priekšā, kuri pat nav fiziski klāt. Laikam instinktīvs sievietes respekts pret alfa meiliem (starp kuriem viņu apziņā gejropas vīrieši sen jau neatrodas).

''man tomēr šķiet smieklīga šī rietumnieku ārdīšanās, demonizējot hidžabus''

Aha.
Man liekas smieklīga tā ārdīšanās demonizējot kukkluksklana robas.
Man liekas smieklīga tā ārdīšanās demonizējot melnu svastiku baltā bumbulī uz sarkana fona.
Man liekas smieklīga tā ārdīšanās demonizējot atsevišķu durvju, izlietņu u.c. atribūtu segregāciju ''for white'' un for ''colored''.
etc. etc. etc.

Pat atsevišķas cibas tā saucamās feministes iet totālā sviestā.
Hidžābs nav vienkārši apģērba gabals. Tas tik tiešām ir simbols sieviešu REĀLAI apspiestībai un drakoniskai diskriminācijai islama valstīs. To pay respect to that shit, it īpaši no pašpasludinātas feministu valdības amatpersonām, kuras tā pat nekad netiktu nedz arestētas nedz kā citādi pārmācītas, ir groteska scēna, kas labi parāda, ka kreisums ir smadzeņu slimība un sevis nīšanas katalizators. Irānas sieviešu tiesību cīnītājas izteica asu kritiku šādai rīcībai un tur bija jūtams neslēpts nicinājums šo zviedru mauku virzienā.
But plz, keep us updated on wage gaps and mansplaining, k.

Iepriekšējā diena - Nākošā diena