|
Apr. 8th, 2011|10:46 pm |
tad mēs atgriežamies pie jautājuma par klasifikācijas patvaļīgumu.
tu saki: visi, kas spiesti strādāt, lai iztiktu, ir strādnieki.
tad tev vēl laikam ir vidusšķira, kas acīmredzot ir uzņēmēji(?)
un iespējams kādas citas šķiras vēl arī?
es saku:
Fair enough, as long as your classification is exhaustive and non-overlapping, it circumscribes nice Euler circles.
The main question, however, is what would you like to achieve by selecting this particular way of classifying people: what is your purpose.
You mentioned clarity, but clarity in itself has really not much to do with classification per se. Meaningfulness according to some purpose would be a better goal for a classification, in my opinion.
Starp citu, kur paliek zemnieki? Strādnieki vai vidusšķira, vai kas? |
|