| Comments: |
Lasot Baibas Rudevskas raksts žurnālā "Telos", kurā viņa izklāsta ideoloģijas ieviešanu tiesību sistēmā, man liek domāt, ka ezotēriskā līmenī mēs esam liecinieki Lucifera un Arimana savienībai. Pilnīga kontrole brīvības (mīksto zinātņu) vārdā.
Absolūti. Ar vien vairāk cilvēku sāk mosties augšā. Waking up to the hangover of realisation that we live in world entirely controlled by Satan/Lucifer and his willing and unwilling minions. Tā ir lieta, kas notiek jau gadsimtiem, bet pēdējā laikā notiek akselerācija. Nezinu vai tas ir apzināti vai piespiedu kārtā, jo internet, the double edged sword, can hurt both the goodies and baddies. That's why there such a censorship on the internet drive in the political and media class, lead by jews, of course.
And if you ask why the later are always so prominent in all of this. Well, they ARE the chosen people. Chosen by the devil.
I don't equate Lucifer with Satan. Satan was Yahweh's prosecutor (Job). Lucifer, it seems, is the figure worshipped by the Masons (see Pike), the source of illumination and enlightenment, which isn't all bad. Though, of course, the Masonic lodge is based on a Jewish King's temple. It just needs to be balanced. Steiner believed Christ could place Lucifer and Ahriman in their allocated places.
So much comes from under the wings of Yahweh (the sign off to the letters of the Rosicrucians). The sons of Seth and the sons of Cain. And it colours today the thoughts and opinions of clever guys and girls who if they gave it a moment of thought would consider it all a load of crap.
I wouldn't, if I were you, fixate so much on the group you blame for everything. There should be some grey in the darkness.
Don't split hairs. Satana/Lucifer, for all intents and purposes is interchangable unless you're occult autist. Lucifer is alleged fallen angel that got the domain of the Earth under his wing. That's his literal name. Satan is more of an all encompassing titular name of all the devilry. Maybe Devil would be the most neutral name for it. Doesn't matter. It all sources back to the same thing, same intents, spread and rule of evil as we know it.
Nav tādu konkrētu "sātanistu". Kroulijs nesauca sevi par tādu. Žīdi, kartāgieši, hazāri, nesauca sevi par tādiem, lai gan pielūdza visus tā avatārus vai demonus, Bālu, Molohu, Bafometu, Asmodeju etc. Vārdiem dažreiz ir mazāk nozīmes, nekā domājam. Svarīgs ir "underlying principles" (and principalities).
Un nē, ews nevaru ignorēt grupu, kas ir velna priesteri šajā pasaulē. Jews are literal clergy of the evil, The Synagogues Of Satan, remember. Not fixating on them is just ignoring one of the, if not THE root problem. The shabos goyim that - the managerial class, are of course complicit as hell and will go there as well, but you just HAVE to address the JQ and not prance about it, because you're scareed they will get you. The netire PC/Woke culture is based on intimidation and coercion, and jews were always the champions if it. They cannot get off the hook there, even if there's 1% of them that don't go along with it. Most rank and file do, absolutely do. They seem to have been imprinted with the luciferian gene. The Ctulhu, Mindbound and bunch of other jewish cibiņi have manifested it in daily for years. Which means they do oblige the "chief commander".
'occult autist' - I'll take that :) | |