I mean "Oh, coercion, right."

This kind of cunt is what... our new technocratic leader?

Where was this fucktard!? Disagree about data and details all you like, but "oh, coercion, right"? Good lord. This will follow me to the end of my days.

(Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread)

Morning, Mindbound. Let me be clear: disagreeing about the general framework of things does not make you a right cunt. However, disputing the existence of, or belittling the significance of the coercion that took place with such offhand condescension (the use of italics - the drawl of the 'right') is in my book - after all the has indisputably occurred - an act of obtuse cuntery.

Thank you for the example of seatbelts. It is a deeply flawed analogy in this context, but as you deleted your comment, it is possible you may have already come to this realisation yourself.

(Reply to this) (Parent)

To those, who crave totalitarian governance there's no such thing as coercion. Only thing that matters is, who the coercers get to be. If it's our guys, great. If it's their guys - FASCISM!

(Reply to this) (Parent)