u rly think so? i don't think i can agree. and by following a pack - are we talking about the fact that they tend to build hierarchies? i just don't think men or women are npcs inherently by default, although they might have a potential for it.

(Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread)

Jaa, i also dont think any of them are npcs lol, im just thinking if anyone is more likely to be npc, it is men not women, so i dont know how that guy arrive to a conclusion that all women are npcs. I feel like women are too weird and peculiar to be npcs, while men are more predictable. Then again, it is just what i think.

(Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread)

alright, yes, how he got to that conclusion is actually smth worth exploring, imho. first, i think he is being honest here, he admits that some of his problems with women might have been caused by the fact that he sees them that way. why he does that tho.. for some ppl women may seem more weird and men more predictable, but for him it could be the opposite. what i gathered from him is that he doesn't rly have any interest in them beyond sex. he doesn't rly care what they think or do, expect when it's related to sex. so..basically their minds are completely irrelevant to him. and if you don't care about smth, it could be invisible to you, like nonexistent. could it be smth like that..?

(Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread)

Ok, so basically npc phenomenon is a philosophical issue, where humans tend to view other humans as npcs when they are not capable or interested in understanding them, simpls. Then again npc is not a real thing so whoever uses that term irl should examine their own perception.

(Reply to this) (Parent)