Paldies par laba vēlējumiem. Uzskatiet tos par bumerangiem. - [entries|archive|friends|userinfo]
aborigens

[ userinfo | sc userinfo ]
[ archive | journal archive ]

[Feb. 17th, 2025|05:23 pm]
Previous Entry Add to Memories Tell A Friend Next Entry
"There are very deep reasons for talking about the weather, reasons that are delicate as well as deep; they lie in layer upon layer of stratified sagacity. First of all it is a gesture of primeval worship. The sky must be invoked; and to begin everything with the weather is a sort of pagan way of beginning everything with prayer. Jones and Brown talk about the weather: but so do Milton and Shelley."

/ Chesterton, What's Wrong with the World
LinkLeave a comment

Comments:
[User Picture]
From:[info]sirualsirual
Date:February 17th, 2025 - 05:37 pm
(Link)
<3
[User Picture]
From:[info]begemots
Date:February 17th, 2025 - 07:02 pm
(Link)
Presymbolic uses of language have this characteristic in common: their functions can be performed, if necessary, without the use of grammatically and syntactically articulated symbolic words.

They can even be performed without recognizable speech at all. Group feeling may be established, for example, among animals by collective barking or howling, and among human beings by college cheers, community singing, and such collective noise-making activities. Indications of friendliness, such as we give when we say "Good morning" or "Nice day, isn't it?" can be given by smiles, gestures, or, as among animals, by nuzzling or sniffing. Frowning, laughing, smiling, and jumping up and down can satisfy a large number of needs for expression without the use of verbal symbols.

But the use of verbal symbols is more customary among human beings, so that instead of expressing our feelings by knocking a man down, we often verbally blast him to perdition; instead of drowning our sorrows in drink, we perhaps write poems.

To understand the presymbolic elements that enter into our everyday language is extremely important. We cannot restrict our speech to the giving and asking of factual information; we cannot confine ourselves strictly to statements that are literally true, or we should often be unable to say even "Pleased to meet you" when the occasion demanded. The intellectually persnickety are always telling us that we "ought to say what we mean" and "mean what we say," and "talk only when we have something to talk about." These are, of course, impossible prescriptions.

// Language in Thought and Action, S.I.Hayakawa, NY 1947