|
Jul. 2nd, 2024|07:15 pm |
Droši vien neies tik ilgi, kamēr nebūs panākta iespēja būvēt privātu enerģētikas infrastruktūru bez stāvēšanas gadiem garās rindās bez garantijas tikt pie atļaujas. Kad reaktora celtniecību varēs pasūtīt tāpat, kā tagad var pasūtīt mājas celtniecību, lielākā daļa šo problēmu vairs neeksistēs, kas tad arī ir tas, ko jāpanāk.
> There are no SMRs running in the US yet, partly because of the lengthy regulatory process run by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC), an independent federal agency.
> Nuclear is the only power source to have its own dedicated regulatory agency in the US. That extra oversight means no detail goes unnoticed, and it can take a while to get nuclear projects moving.
> The upgraded power rating requires some adjustments, but the module design is fundamentally the same. Still, it means that the company needed to resubmit updated plans to the NRC, which it did last month. It could take up to two years before the altered plans are approved by the agency and the company can move on to site approval
https://www.technologyreview.com/2023/02/08/1067992/smaller-nuclear-reactors/
NuScale SMR aprobācijas process vilkās no 2016. līdz 2023. g., kas ir labs piemērs tieši šai problēmai un nepieciešamībai atbrīvoties no šāda balasta industrijas turpmākas izaugsmes labad. |
|