- 4.1.11 23:18
-
nevis gribasspēka trūkumā, bet tā stiprumā/vājumā. tik pat labi varētu pajautāt, kāpēc vienam cilvēkam gribasspēks ir stiprāks un citam vājāks!
nevis tikai izmest tādu postulātu un par to pārstāt domāt...
(īstenībā to pat vajag pajautāt: "[...] low delayers, the children who rang the bell quickly, seemed more likely to have behavioral problems, both in school and at home. They got lower S.A.T. scores. They struggled in stressful situations, often had trouble paying attention, and found it difficult to maintain friendships. The child who could wait fifteen minutes had an S.A.T. score that was, on average, two hundred and ten points higher than that of the kid who could wait only thirty seconds.
Carolyn Weisz is a textbook example of a high delayer. She attended Stanford as an undergraduate, and got her Ph.D. in social psychology at Princeton. She’s now an associate psychology professor at the University of Puget Sound.")
Kāpēc daži spēj nomest smēķēšanu (lauzt nikotīna atkarību), bet citi paliek visu mūžu smēķēt? Kāpēc daži no tiem ar noslieci uz alkoholismu, spēj atteikties no alkohola, bet citi nožēlojami nodzeras. Utt.
"gribasspēka trūkums" nav atbilde. tas ir tikai solis uz atbildi.