Moralaas vertibas un principi, pec kuriem mes vadamies veicot vai neveicot kadu darbibu, ir diezgan ipatna lieta. Lielai dalai cilveku ir sava skala, kas lauj izsvert starp "labu" un "sliktu", kas, protams, pati par sevi ir pieredze balstita fikcija. Savukart ir ari cilveki, kam shi laba/slikta izverteshana sagada zinamas grutibas - piemeram berni, kam pieredze vai sabiedribas spiediena bijis salidzinoshi neliels. Ir arii dazhadu vecumu pieaugushie, kuri kadu iemeslu del ir apjukushi, piemeram konfliktejoshas pieredzes del. Zinu, ka zagt nav labi, bet kaiminjsh nozaga un dzivo svilpodams. Varbut tomer zagt nav nemaz tik slikti? Un tada gara.

Anyway, parastam cilvekam, kursh ir salidzinoshi laimigs, psihologiski noturigs un parliecinats, ka spej atskirt labu no slikta, tadas lekcijas (religija, psihologa apmeklejumi, u.t.t.) skiet pilnigas mulkibas. Man nevajag, lai kads man stasta, kad sievieti uz restoranu vest vai kad maju sakt celt. Es diezgan labi pats tieku gala ar saviem pienakumiem un mes ar sievu pashi spejam atbildibas lomas sadalit. Doh! Bet ir tie apjukushie cilveki, kas mekle atbildes (atkal - sada tipa lekcijas, religijaa, pie psihologiem, Koelju gramatas) un kapec gan vinus par to nosodit? Vini censhas saprast un izprast. Loti labi, ja saprot, ka pasi netiek gala un mekle palidzibu.

Var jau teikt, ka ta pati kristietiba ir pretrunigu apgalvojumu apkopojums (un es runaju tikai par veco deribu un evangeliju, tas "vestules", ko baznica piekabinajusi bibelei, butu baznicteviem publiski dir$aas jaiebazh - grozi ka gribi, bet ta nav Kristus maciba), bet tie pashi 10 baushli - ja tiem seko - ir labs sakums kadam, kas ir apjucis. Cita lieta, ka varbut nevajadzetu visu uztvert burtiski.

Sheit jauks citats no John Cleese, kas, manuprat, ir loti trapigs gan visparigi par religiju, gan Uga Kuga meginajumiem tulkot religiju: "[..] I think that the central problem of any religion is that the founders of religion are always extraordinary intelligent people and what you notice as you get older is that extraordinary intelligent people are not literal minded and the great problem with religion is when what is said by the fellow with the religion which was supposed to be taken metaphorically is taken literally and that's where you get complete nonsense being made of what the founder of the religion said and indeed people claiming more or less that the founder of the religion said the opposite of what they believe except they haven't realized it." Trouble understanding? Find it on youtube.