([info]methodrone) wrote on February 5th, 2013 at 01:58 am
jaa, bet lai arii tie percepti vairs nav 'pure' un kaut kaadi saakotneeji, vinji ir patiesi in itself, kameer vinji nav interpreteeeti un piepildiiti ar meanings. nu taa, ka vinji ir ljoti lidziigi, nu taas reaali ir sajuutas vairaak kaa domas. un tur un taa jau tas notiek, ka sanaak ka sajuutas nevar buut domas, taads duaalisms, bet es domaaju, ka var, sajuutas ir tiiraakas domas. bet pashas sajuutas, protams, ir veidojushaas tagad kaa atbilde uz konceptualizeetaam domaam. tas taads rinjkjis.
 
( Read comments )
Post a comment in response:
From:
( )Anonymous- this user has disabled anonymous posting.
Username:
Password:
Subject:
No HTML allowed in subject
  
Message: