21 May 2012 @ 03:27 pm
oppression  
Carol Adams also proposes a quintessential relationship between men and meat. In a polemical and emotive account entitled The Sexual Politics of Meat (1990), she suggests that meat-eating is a symbol of patriarchy. ‘Meat-eating’, she says, ‘is the re-inscription of male power at every meal’ (1990:187). For Adams, the fate of women and animals is inextricably linked. They are both tyrannised and violated by men and her analysis equates the physical and sexual subjugation of women to the butchery of animals. Thus, feminism and vegetarianism are similar struggles against a common—male—oppressor.
 
 
( Post a new comment )
cukursēne[info]saccharomyces on May 21st, 2012 - 03:42 pm
par to, ka viss ir sasniegts, atļaušos oponēt, visur jau tā īsti nav. tas gan, protams, neattaisno apsēstas, krūšturus dedzinošas feministes. :D

bet jābeidz prokrastinēt, un tas jau arī neattiecas uz tēmu.
(Reply) (Parent) (Thread) (Link)
[info]antirealist on May 21st, 2012 - 03:46 pm
"viss" tas, protams, ir vispārināti, piekrītu. bet sākotnējie postulāti ir lielos vilcienos realizēti. atlikušas diskutablas detaļas un nianses.
(Reply) (Parent) (Link)