“If you cannot or will not imagine the results of your actions, there’s no way you can act morally or responsibly,” [Ursula K. Le Guin] told The Guardian in an interview in 2005. “Little kids can’t do it; babies are morally monsters — completely greedy. Their imagination has to be trained into foresight and empathy.” The writer’s “pleasant duty,” she said, is to ply the reader’s imagination with “the best and purest nourishment that it can absorb.”

honeybee komentārs par to, ka, iespējams, pēc nāves Le Gvinas klātesamība pasaulē ir nevis pazudusi, bet kļuvusi izkliedētāka, kaut kā izcili sasaucās ar šo pašas Le Gvinas dzejoli.
varbūt viņai toreiz jau viss bija skaidrs un izplānots, he.



The skin

“All around us is the skin,
helping keep our bodies in.”

I’ve known that poem sixty years.
There’s more to it than first appears.

If we were skinless, like a cloud,
would we not mingle with the crowd?

Would not our little bodies be
more boundless even than the sea,

and gaseous as the atmosphere?
Would we be there as well as here?

Would I be you, and you be me,
and both of us mere entropy?

The two it takes to tango need
to be discrete, not just discreet.

The skin, however, does have holes
for letting in and out our souls,

our food, and such necessities.
It is designed to serve and please.

It washes well, but with the years
gets wrinkles, little spots and smears,

and somehow doesn’t seem to fit
as seamlessly as once as it did.

But still it is my nomad’s tent,
my shelter, my integument,

the outside of myself, this thin,
seemingly superficial skin,

that hems me neatly all about,
keeping foreign bodies out,
and keeping me, a while yet, in.

//Ursula K. Le Guin, 2008