Uz šāda veida revolucionāri tiesiskajā apziņā balstītu apsūdzību pamata sovoki šāva nost "nepareizi" domājošos jau kopš Krievijas pilsoņu kara laikiem un arī okupācijas laikā Latvijai nolaida asinis, sevišķi 1941. un 1949.gadā. Konkrētais kadrs ne reizi vien jau ir paudis atbalstu "nepareizi" domājošo slepkavošanai, kā arī citu "nepareizu" cilvēku dehumanizēšanai.

Why did the elites of Germany so consistently underestimate Hitler? Possibly because they weren’t actually wrong in their assessment of his competency - they just failed to realise that this wasn’t enough to stand in the way of his ambition. As it would turn out, Hitler was really bad at running a government. As his own press chief Otto Dietrich later wrote in his memoir The Hitler I Knew, "In the twelve years of his rule in Germany Hitler produced the biggest confusion in government that has ever existed in a civilized state.

Jūkejam pat hokejā nesanāk breksitot kā nākas.

American physicist Steven Weinberg famously remarked that ‘with or without religion, good people can behave well and bad people can do evil; but for good people to do evil – that takes religion’. It makes sense, then, to think of the social-justice movement as a kind of cult. Its members are generally decent people with good intentions. They have an unshakeable certainty that their worldview is correct. They feel the need to proselytise and convert as many of the fallen as possible. And even though they are capable of the most horrendous dehumanising behaviour, they think they are the good guys.

Visātrākais un veiksmīgākais breksits so far būs jūkeja hokejistu izlidošana no pasaules čempja A grupas.

"..пьяный избил Бормана...в Гестапо орал русские песни..." Мюллер перевернул страницу..."..зашел к Гитлеру..насрал на стол... бродил по Берлину и кричал по русски " можем повторить".. Каждый год 10 мая Мюллер получал один и тот же доклад о вчерашних проделках Штирлица..

Tātad, apelācijas tiesa atcēlusi spriedumu Tomija Robinsona lietā (dēļ procesuāliem pārkāpumiem) nosūtot lietu jaunai izskatīšanai (daži jefiņi atkal izliekas nesaprotam, ka tā nav atzīšana par nevainīgu). Nav šaubu, ka tā mēdz notikt policejiskās valstīs (par ko daži savlaik brēkāja).

Upd. Par to, ka procesuāla pārkāpuma jēdziena izpratne ir par grūtu dažu vispāratzītu Cibas grūtgalvīšu cāļa smadzenēm es jau esmu informēts, tādēļ nav nepieciešams lieku reizi man to atgādināt.

Pona Ņūmena tēlotā advokāta uzruna zvērināto tiesai filmā "The Verdict":

“You know, so much of the time we’re just lost. We say, please God, tell us what is right. Tell us what is true. When there is no justice – the rich win, the poor are powerless. We become tired of hearing people lie. And after a time we become dead, a little dead. We think of ourselves as victims. And we become victims. We become weak. We doubt ourselves, we doubt our beliefs. We doubt our institutions. And we doubt the law. Well, today you are the law. You are the law. Not some book. Not the lawyers. Not the marble statue or the trappings of the court. See, those are just symbols of our desire to be just. They are, they are, in fact, a prayer, a fervent and a frightened prayer. In my religion, they say act as if ye had faith. Faith will be given to you. If, if we are to have faith in justice we need only to believe in ourselves. And act with justice. See, I believe there is justice in our hearts.”

par tīnspiritu kā progresa sēklu un dzīves sāli
( tālāk seko daudz paštīksminošas masturbācijas )