phoenix ([info]phoenix) wrote on January 20th, 2005 at 10:54 pm
es te taa negribu braukt visam ar lielo zaptskaroti pa vidu, bet...
viss, ko cilveeks saka, izskaa, viedokļojas -t as viss ir vinja personiigasi viedoklis, attieciigi personiigaas simpaatijas/antipaatijas/utt. Un ats nav specialai jaauzsver ar vaardiem "manupraat" un taadiem.

Ja indiviids paarstaav kaadu citu viedokli,t ad gan vinjsh iesaak savu runu ar vaardiem "taa un taa vaardaaa es saku to un to, vai arii paarstaavot to un to, es jusm tagad izklaastiishu taadu un taadu viedokli".

vnk, mees baigi esam pieradusi, ka cilveeks baarstaas ne ar savaam peerleem, un liidz ar to izveidojuises otraadaaka situaacija - ka tiek uzsveerts savs viedoklis, citos gadiijumos ljaujot domaat,ka vinjsh nerunaa nos evis, bet citu vaardaa, citu idejaas.

ai, nez, mosh saprati mani, mosh, nee. Un, mosh, es kljuudos.
 
( Read comments )
Post a comment in response:
From:
( )Anonymous- this user has disabled anonymous posting.
Username:
Password:
Subject:
No HTML allowed in subject
  
Message:

Notice! This user has turned on the option that logs your IP address when posting.