brookings - neo-classical domination [entries|archive|friends|userinfo]
brookings

[ userinfo | sc userinfo ]
[ archive | journal archive ]

neo-classical domination [Apr. 17th, 2012|05:36 am]
Previous Entry Add to Memories Tell A Friend Next Entry
"So have the non-economists grasped their moment? Have they hell. Look at the academic conferences held over the past few weeks, at which the latest and most promising research in each discipline is presented, and it's as if Lehman Brothers never fell over."

Un šeit - laikam tas pats stāsts. Tikai 'citi' ekonomisti var atļauties "ķert savu brīdi". Lai gan tie, kā Steve Keen, ir ļoti interesanti. Viņš apgalvo, ka neo-classical ekonomisti savos modeļos, neņem vērā, kā banku sistēma var radīt naudu, no gandrīz nekā.


linkpost comment

Comments:
From:[info]karuna
Date:April 17th, 2012 - 06:46 pm
(Link)
Šis bija labs raksts. Tas ir apmēram tāpat kā kristietība, kas beidzot ir atzinusi, ka Bībeles mācība ikdienas dzīvē nav piemērojama (nu tur kosmoloģija, evolūcija utt.), bet neuzdrošinās atbalstīt laika garam atbilstošus uzskatus.
[User Picture]
From:[info]brookings
Date:April 18th, 2012 - 09:46 am

Sects and Heretics

(Link)
Piekritu - piemēram ši ir daļa no Krugmana atbildes uz Keena:

"“I’m all for listening to heretics when they offer insights I can use, but I’m not finding that at all in this conversation, just word games and continual insistence that the members of the sect have insights denied to us lesser mortals. Time to move on.”
[User Picture]
From:[info]brookings
Date:April 18th, 2012 - 09:52 am
(Link)
Starp citu - par to, ka neo-classical ekonomisti neņem verā banku sistēmu savos modeļos, vairāk šeit: "http://www.creditwritedowns.com/2012/04/krugmans-flashing-neon-sign.html"