|
Nov. 25th, 2021|06:01 pm |
Yes, this does require research, because vaccines could be the culprit, eg. in any particular case.
But even then the essential question would remain unanswered -- was having the vaccine even in that particular case WORSE than the disease would have been? I mean, would he have been alive, if he had had covid and hadn't vaccinated?
I mean, if it would be reasonably certain that I can avoid COVID, I wouldn't vaccinate -- but then again, nobody would, and nobody would be asked to vaccinate in the first place.
Since it seems opposite, vaccination *is a risk* that still seems (to me) comparatively smaller than having the full blown disease.
As regards these deaths, unfortunately, since you can't have a person both vaccinated and unvaccinated, it might take some time to reach an answer due to (thankfully comparatively small so far) sample size. I foresee a number of somewhat formidable problems though in distinguishing between covid-related and vaccine-related issues, that might require some thinking or -- unfortunately larger sample size -- to arrive to some degree of certainty.
|
|