|
Aug. 31st, 2016|09:55 pm |
I am afraid they might.
However, my point was that as far as I could read into that hacked report, the report-makers were basically trying to say that:
(a) the current state of migration is bad from their point of view mainly because there are lots of human rights violations happening to the migrants AND the governments do not see migration as the global phenomenon that the report-makers believe it to be;
(b) that they want to change the policies of governments, so that the attitude towards migration would change (as far as I could read, in the direction of better support for migrants' human rights);
(c) that the current migration levels (including refugees) are going to stay with us, so we should be better prepared for them in long-term.
That seemed to be it. But maybe I am wrong, and perhaps you can read into it better and discover some nefarious tendencies or hints of them, at least.
Because the New American seems to have simply drawn the wonderful conclusion: "you talk about migration therefore you created it".
|
|