| eng vs hrv |
[17. Jun 2026|23:05] |
es, protams, vēlējos, lai uzvar eng, taču man galīgi nepatika tas otro reizi veiktais sods.
[i don't know much about any of this, so i looked it up, why player was allowed to re-do it:
"At the time a kick is taken the keeper must have one foot on or above the line, and images showed that Livakovic had moved fractionally too soon." idk, seems silly. player stuttered before the kick - he's allowed to do it, but goalkeeper is not allowed to move? what was he supposed to do then?]
tā kā bija 4:2, tad tā ir uzvara, bet, ja būtu 3:2, es to uzskatītu par neizšķirtu doggy soda dēļ. |
|
|
