23 Septembris 2010 @ 17:56
 
Lately I've been wanting to get into people's minds more and more. No, it's not a weird urge to know every thought of everyone around me (though it would be somewhat cool). No, the what doesn't particularly interest me. What I want to know is how. I want to know how fast they can add two four-digit numbers, how much they remember of the book they read two years ago, how green the green of birch leaves are to them, how the world works in their eyes. I want to know how other people tick, how their gears are connected and in which direction they turn. And I hate the fact that this knowledge currently can't be gained in the same way ancient biologists gained their knowledge of the human anatomy - by cutting subjects open and taking notes.

I could always read up something on the subject of human psychology, but it's a soft science. It tells a lot of useless whats and far too little hows and even then not the ones I need to know.
 
 
Jūtos:: pensive
Klausos: Star One - Starchild
 
 
( Post a new comment )
302cc9b4780f8cbef6f70c3a8417913050b6aafb[info]mindbound on 23. Septembris 2010 - 19:13
Evolutionary psychology, cognistics, neurology, complex systems theory, cybernetics. The methods of the usual psychology, almost without exceptions, describe only the results, not the causes or underlying mechanisms.
(Atbildēt) (Diskusija) (Link)
Eiše: Lightbulb[info]lea on 23. Septembris 2010 - 21:04
Cognitive science and neuroscience are probably what I'm looking for. However it oddly seems not enough. Yet. Time to absorb more knowledge.
(Atbildēt) (Iepriekšējais) (Diskusija) (Link)
302cc9b4780f8cbef6f70c3a8417913050b6aafb[info]mindbound on 23. Septembris 2010 - 21:24
It is not enough, but it builds a steady staircase. There is a whole new discipline of science of mind in making, I cannot even properly name it yet, but it is what von Neumann would have liked his cybernetics to become.

First chapter of my work-in-progress book is practically complete, when the remarks and red correction blocks are gone and the whole text is proofread for the first time, I could send you the draft, if you would like to.
(Atbildēt) (Iepriekšējais) (Diskusija) (Link)
Eiše: Gaisma rokā[info]lea on 23. Septembris 2010 - 21:55
That's probably the beauty of modern science - everything is in its infancy, but in the same time evolving, growing right before our eyes.

And yes, I'd love that.

(Atbildēt) (Iepriekšējais) (Link)
[info]nirnaeth on 24. Septembris 2010 - 14:16
Nu tā, rupji izsakoties:

"I'm astounded by people who want to 'know' the universe when it's hard enough to find your way around Chinatown" - Woody Allen
(Atbildēt) (Diskusija) (Link)
Eiše[info]lea on 25. Septembris 2010 - 13:29
To 'know' the Universe is to know madness. Currently I'm quite content with learning about the workings of 0.(0)1% of it.
(Atbildēt) (Iepriekšējais) (Link)