|
[10. Dec 2011|17:20] |
Pirms kāda laika thel rakstīja par tendenci noklusēt T. Celma sakarus ar nacistiem. Izskatās, ka līdzīgas problēmas bijušas arī citur:
There is some irony for me in the fact that the man about whose philosophical views I have devoted, over years, a great deal of time to thinking, was, at least at the end of his life, a virulent racist, specifically an anti-semite. This fact is revealed by a fragment of a diary which survives among Frege's Nachlass, but which was not published with the rest by Professor Hans Hermes in Freges nachgelassene Schriften. The diary shows Frege to have been a man of extreme right-wing political opinions, bitterly opposed to the parliamentary system, democrats, liberals, Catholics, the French and, above all, Jews, who he thought ought to be deprived of political rights and, preferably, expelled from Germany. When I first read that diary, many years ago, I was deeply shocked, because I had revered Frege as an absolutely rational man, if, perhaps, not a very likeable one. I regret that the editors of Frege's Nachlass chose to suppress that particular item. From it I learned something about human beings which I should be sorry not to know; perhaps something about Europe, also. Michael Dummett. Frege: Philosophy of Language, 1973, p. xii |
|
|
Comments: |
Laikam nodreijāts temats, bet kā īsti šinī kontekstā bija ar Heidegeru?
Manuprāt gan dažādi privātie uzskati nevar kalpot par jebkādu papildus nosacījumu vērtējot devumu idejiskā/filozofiskā/profesionālā ziņā.
| From: | junona |
Date: | 10. Decembris 2011 - 20:53 |
---|
| | | (Link) |
|
Iesaku palasīt Haidegera darbiņu "Ievads metafizikā". Tur būs arī devums idejiskā ziņā. | |