| 3:01p |
garlaicigi - par darbu
nu, laikam man sovakar bus brivs vakars, un - es nevilus piekeeru sevi pie svetlaimigas domas: CIK JAUKI, vareesu ilgaak pastraadaat !
vai taa nav darbaholisma paziime ? nu, man vienalga, man patiik straadat un par to (vairs) nekaunos un neuztraucos
Mans darba rezims ir tads:
- liidz pudienlaikam daru menedzmenta lietas un tad, ja nekas nedeg (parasti jau diemzel deg) - pecpusdienaa taisu rakstinjus
un sobrid man ir 1 raksts, kuram palicis "tikai" Introduction and Discussion, nu vel vispareja noslipesana
M& M and Results jau ir diezgan labs, pat Abstracts un Conclusions iraid
Pazelosos & palielisos: tas raksts man pasai loti patik, nu loti, nu loti, bet pie diskusijas loti mokos, jo ko es gribu pateikt: sitas ir taa, kaa ezeru lietas jaadara, tas ir kaut kas unikaals un forss un geniaals, ko mes esam izdarijusi, luk !
Bet nu, tas japasaka inteligentak, un pie taa inteligentaak esmu iestreegusi.
Katram rakstam vajag laiku, vienkarsi laiku, ko tu pavadi seedot ar vinju. Taapat kaa beernam, neko nevar dariit un miileet no taalienes, taa nu tas ir.
Luuk kaa diskusija varetu sakties (bet tomer man nepatik isti):
Limnologists have been effective (nav labs vaards) in developing a sound fundamental understanding of eutrophication process. They have been far less successful to establish ecologically sound quality targets. Despite of a wealth of research on eutrophication, it causes, and associated effects ( …), biological response gradient have been only rarely used for setting ecological criteria. Instead,,, |